The analysis of the DMs that are employed in expository essays might point to the fact that the use of these devices is affected by EFL learners’ proficiency levels. Lower proficiency EFL learners tend to use more restricted and redundant sets of DMs. Lower levels of proficiency might result in restricting the functions that are served by DMs, limiting the syntactic categories from which these markers are drawn and affecting the variety of the positions that they occupy.
References
Asassfeh, S., Alshboul, S., & Alshaboul, Y. (2013). Distribution and appropriateness of use of logical connectors in the academic writing of Jordanian English- major undergraduates. JournalofEducational&PsychologicalSciences,14(3),12-35.
Blakemore, D. (1987). Semanticconstraintsonrelevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brinton, L. (1996). PragmaticmarkersinEnglish.Grammaticalizationanddiscoursefunctions.Berlin: de Gruyter.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridgegrammar ofEnglish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Djigunović, M., & Vikov, Gloria. (2011). Acquisition of discourse markers: Evidence from EFL writing. Seraz,55, 255-278.
Fraser, B. (1990). An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 383- 395. Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics,6(2), 167-190.
Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journalof Pragmatics,31, 931-952.
Fraser, B. (2005). Towards a theory of discourse markers. In: Fischer, Kerstin (Ed.), Approaches to discourseparticles, (pp.189-204). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
Fraser, B. (2009). An account of discourse markers. InternationalReviewof Pragmatics,1,1–28.
Fung, L. (2003). TheuseandteachingofdiscourseMarkersinHong-Kong.Student'sproductionandteachers'perspectives. Unpublished PhD thesis, Nottingham University, United Kingdom.
Jalilfar, A. (2008). Discourse markers in composition writings: The case of Iranian learner of English as a foreign language. EnglishLanguage Teaching, 1(2), 114-122.
Lam, P. (2007). Discourse