REVIEW
Kevin’s essay is highly relatable—it is an endearing account of a person still very much undecided
about the course of his life, a state that doubtless many college applicants find themselves in. Kevin
has crafted a number of very beautiful sentences and images, and the flow of his writing is unique. Of
particular note are Kevin’s descriptions of what he sees outside of the train—his sentence, “Fields,
farmlands, forests speed by,” is elegant not only for its brevity, but for its
mimetic similarity to how
things are seen out of a fast-moving train. Still, at times the essay reads as though Kevin was trying
too hard, with too many SAT words and too little genuine feeling behind them. Sentences like, “I
introduce the scientific law of conservation from which I derive my latest conjecture,” attempt to
prove that Kevin is intelligent, and the essay loses its relatability in the mire of unnatural language.
Kevin’s writing is at its best when it’s clean and simple; where he strays from this,
the prose can
become overwrought, and distracts from Kevin’s message.
Furthermore, some of the clarity of Kevin’s essay is lost in too many metaphors. For example in
his last paragraph, Kevin describes himself as a puppy, and then two sentences later resolves to “apply
the next coat of paint” as if he were an artist? Even without the mixed metaphors, his last sentence
might be difficult to understand for a harried admissions officer—his last reference to the paint
metaphor appeared a number of paragraphs earlier. Kevin’s image of “paint
suffused across a broad
surface” is a novel and interesting one—had he pruned away his many other comparisons and instead
concentrated and developed this one, his essay would have made gains in both style and clarity.
Kevin’s essay thus serves as a good lesson in both its successes and its failings: In a medium as short
as a personal statement, natural-feeling language and a clear, unified vision are key.
—Erica X. Eisen