No Paper Title Author Name Page No

MERICAN Journal of Public Diplomacy and International Studies
www.
 grnjournal.us 
 
AMERICAN Journal of Public Diplomacy and
International Studies 
Volume 01, Issue 06, 2023 ISSN (E): 2993-2157 
 
 
 
Development of Bureaucracy in Administrative 
Management
 
Normuratov Aktam Tulaboy ugli
 
Teacher of the Department of Administrative and Financial Law Toshkent State University
of Law 
 
 
Abstract: 
In this article, the history of the origin of bureaucratism, the rational management 
system, the failure of public administration, red tape, heavy procedures, administrative obstacles, 
the peculiarity of the rational bureaucracy system. Also, scientific researches and conclusions of 
foreign and our country's scientists on the role of administrative bureaucracy in resolving 
disputes arising in state administration were analyzed and studied.
Keywords: 
bureaucracy, administrative barriers, red tape, rational bureaucracy system, 
bureaucratic mentality, bureaucratic rituals.
 
When we talk about bureaucracy, it is related to the employees of the administrative apparatus of 
any social organization - officials, officials who have gained enormous power over other people. 
The peculiarity of the bureaucratic form of management is a certain set of procedures, thanks to 
which the official is the only person on whom the success or failure of solving a particular 
problem depends. Such exclusive power separates the official from ordinary citizens, elevates 
him above society and creates a special aura of "bureaucratic mentality"
1
. 
The term "bureaucracy" entered scientific circulation thanks to the German sociologist, 
economist, historian Max Weber, the author of the most complete and comprehensive 
sociological study of the phenomenon of bureaucracy. 
Weber proposed the following principles for the bureaucratic concept of organizational structure: 

hierarchical structure of the organization; 

hierarchy of orders based on legal force; 

the subordinate's obedience to the superior and responsibility not only for his own actions, 
but also for the actions of subordinates; 

specialization and division of labor according to functions; 

a clear system of procedures and rules that ensure the uniformity of the implementation of 
production processes; 

a system of promotion and tenure based on skills and experience and measured by standards; 

orient the communication system to written rules both inside and outside the organization
2
. 
1
Попович А.С. От бюрократизации управления до бюрократизации мысли / А.С. Попович, З.А.Попович. – 
М.: ЛЕНАНД, 2014. – 392 с. 
2
Вебер М. Социализм. Речь, произнесенная в Вене перед австрийскими офицерами с целью их общей 
ориентации (июнь 1918) // Вебер М. Политические работы (1895–1919) : пер. с нем. М., 2003. С. 300–342. 

---

133
A