Bosh muharrir: Sharipov Qo‘ng‘irotboy Avezimbetovich Bosh muharrir o‘rinbosari: Karimov Norboy G‘aniyevich

 environmental_cult~e
 Coef.
 St.Err.
 t-value
 p-value
 [95% 
Conf
 Interval]
 Sig
green economy effe~a
1
.
.
.
.
.
2
205.178
216.023
5.06
0
26.058
1615.557
***
3
238.247
237.196
5.50
0
33.851
1676.779
***
4
240.953
237.543
5.56
0
34.896
1663.745
***
5
421.841
419.502
6.08
0
60.071
2962.308
***
ecosystem_ranking
1.383
.126
3.54
0
1.156
1.654
***
natural capital ev~s
1
.
.
.
.
.
2
4.869
4.155
1.86
.064
.914
25.933
*
3
2.886
2.373
1.29
.198
.576
14.464
4
1.992
1.614
0.85
.395
.407
9.747
5
3.744
3.024
1.63
.102
.769
18.231
digital management
1
.
.
.
.
.
yes
1.309
.82
0.43
.668
.383
4.471
age : base 25–30
1
.
.
.
.
.
31–40
.603
.109
–2.80
.005
.423
.859
***
41–50
1.155
.238
0.70
.484
.771
1.731
other
3.143
3.02
1.19
.233
.478
20.668
gender : base female
1
.
.
.
.
.
male
.846
.099
–1.43
.153
.672
1.065
experience : base ~Р°
1
.
.
.
.
.
1–2
.997
.291
–0.01
.992
.563
1.766
3–5
1.135
.251
0.57
.566
.736
1.751
6–10
1.1
.237
0.44
.658
.721
1.679
cut1
3.508
.928
.b
.b
1.689
5.326
cut2
4.915
.961
.b
.b
3.032
6.798
cut3
6.791
.971
.b
.b
4.888
8.695
cut4
7.911
.974
.b
.b
6.003
9.819
Mean dependent var
4.266
SD dependent var
1.086
Pseudo r-squared
0.159
Number of obs 
1358
Chi-square
490.989
Prob > chi2
0.000
Akaike crit. (AIC)
2641.972
Bayesian crit. (BIC)
2751.461
*** p<.01, ** p<.05, * p<.1
The coefficient is 1.383, indicating that an increase in ecosystem ranking is associated with a higher likeli-
hood of higher environmental culture values. The standard error is 0.126, and the t-value is 3.54, indicating that 
the coefficient is statistically significant at the 0.05 level. The p-value is 0, which further supports the statistical 
significance of the relationship
The coefficient is 1.309, but it is not statistically significant as indicated by the high p-value of 0.668. The 
standard error is 0.82, and the t-value is 0.43, suggesting a lack of statistical significance. 
The age group “31–40” shows a coefficient of 0.603, which is statistically significant at the 0.05 level 
(p-value = 0.005), indicating that being in this age group is associated with higher environmental culture values 
compared to the reference age group (25–30).

---

T
ARA
QQIY
O
T
ПР
ОГРЕС
С
PR
OGRESS
126
YA S H I L I Q T I S O D I Y O T VA TA R A Q Q I Y O T
https://yashil-iqtisodiyot-taraqqiyot.uz
2023-yil, iyul.
№
7-son.
The coefficient for the male gender is 0.846, but it is not statistically significant as indicated by the p-value 
of 0.153. This suggests that gender does not have a significant effect on environmental culture. Cut1, Cut2, 
Cut3, Cut4: These represent the thresholds that divide the ordered categories of the dependent variable. Coef-
ficients, standard errors, and confidence intervals are provided for each cut point.
P(environmental culture=“1”) = P(S + u ≤ _cut1) = P(S + u ≤ 3.508);
P(environmental culture =“2”) = P(S + u ≤ _cut2) = P(3.508P(environmental culture =“3”) = P(S + u ≤ _cut3) = P(4.915P(environmental culture =“4”) = P(S + u ≤ _cut4) = P(6.7910
5
10
0
5
10
25-30
31-40
41-50
Бошқа
25-30
31-40
41-50
Бошқа
25-30
31-40
41-50
Бошқа
Бошқа
1-2
3-5
6-10
asobserved
Аёл
Эркак
asobserved
Li
ne
ar
P
re
di
ct
io
n
age
Predictive Margins with 95% CIs
Figure 1:
Age and gender interaction marginal effect 
The provided output presents the predictive margins for the interaction between age and gender in relation 
to the dependent variable (environmental culture). The predictive margins for the interaction between age and 
gender are presented for each combination of age category and gender category. For example, the predictive 
mean value for the combination of age category 25–30 and gender category Аёл (female) is provided, along 
with its standard error, t-value, p-value, and confidence interval. Similarly, the predictive mean values for other 
combinations of age and gender are presented.
5 . D I S C U S S I O N
The provided output presents the results of an ordered logistic regression analysis examining the relation-
ship between various independent variables and the dependent variable (environmental culture). Here’s a dis-
cussion of the findings based on the provided coefficients, standard errors, t-values, p-values, and confidence 
intervals: