Conservation Management Zones of Australia Western Australia Temperate Sandplain Woodlands



Yüklə 194.11 Kb.
səhifə4/10
tarix24.08.2017
ölçüsü194.11 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

Natural Resource Management practices and sources of NRM advice


this column graph shows the percent of agricultural holdings within the zone that undertake control of feral animals. 3 percent undertake other (unspecified) feral animal control) 96 percent do not undertake management of feral animals 1 percent did not provide data.

this column graph shows the percent of agricultural holdings within the zone that undertake actions to protect or regenerate native vegetation on their property. 1.5 percent have fenced off native vegetation or excluded stock 1.2 percent manage weeds 3.2 percent are reducing grazing pressure 0.2 percent are stopping mechanical or chemical destruction 0.2 percent are undertaking ‘other’ native vegetation management actions.

* Data obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2012 Land Management Practices Survey (LaMPS) 2012. LaMPS collected land practices information from approximately 50,000 farm businesses across Australia. The data has been aligned to Conservation Management Zones from ABS Statistical Area 2 units and Australian Agricultural Environment units. The % figures presented here are indicative only. For more information on LaMPS please refer to: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4630.0

this pie graph compares the percent of agricultural holdings within the zone that sought advice when adopting native vegetation management practices. 48.84 percent sought advice 51.16 percent did not seek advice.

this column graph compares the percent of agricultural holdings within the zone that sought advice from different sources, versus the percent that did not seek advice from these sources. more than 50 percent sought advice from landcare or farmer production groups 0 percent sought advice from farmer groups 0 percent sought advice from peers or neighbours less than 50 percent sought advice from government extension officers less than 50 percent sought advice from private consultants or agribusiness agents less than 50 percent sought advice from catchment management authorities or natural resource management region employed facilitators 0 percent sought advice from a research and development corporation.

** The sample for the Drivers of Practice Change 2012 survey consisted of a random subsample of 1228 broadacre farm managers from the Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey (AAGIS) frame. The data has been aligned to Conservation Management Zones from ABS Statistical Area 2 units. For this reason, the figures presented here are indicative only.

^ This chart indicates the sources of advice utilised for native vegetation management from respondents who identified they sought advice.

For more information please refer to http://www.daff.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/forestry/domestic-forestry/prep-for-future/drivers-

Land tenure, land use, Native Title and Local Government Areas


this pie graph shows the tenure of land across the zone. 6.17 percent is crown land that is private and leased 25.27 percent is crown land that is public 3.24 percent is crown land that is public and leased 0.77 percent is freehold – public 62.57 percent is freehold – unknown 1.99 percent is categorised as ‘no data/unknown’.

this pie graph shows land use across the zone. 13 percent of land is used for grazing native vegetation 26 percent is used for conservation and natural environments 61 percent is used for cropping and horticulture

Land tenure data based on Environmental Resources Information Network (ERIN) categorisation of Public Sector Mapping Authority (PSMA) State Tenure 2012; Land use mapping based on Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP) 2012. For more information on Australian land use and management information and classification please refer to: http://www.daff.gov.au/ABARES/aclump/



Indigenous Land Councils

South-West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council: http://www.noongar.org.au

Although there have been no Native Title Determinations finalised within this Conservation Management Zone, it continues to represent important Indigenous heritage values and places that are of deep significance to Indigenous persons and their practices, observations, customs, beliefs and history.

Local Government Areas

City Of Greater Geraldton

WA

Shire Of Carnamah

WA

Shire Of Chapman Valley

WA

Shire Of Coorow

WA

Shire Of Dalwallinu

WA

Shire Of Dandaragan

WA

Shire Of Irwin

WA

Shire Of Mingenew

WA

Shire Of Moora

WA

Shire Of Northampton

WA

Shire Of Shark Bay

WA

Shire Of Three Springs

WA


1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə