should probably be practiced more than other kinds of talks, given that a job
offer may depend on your performance.
Practicing talks, however, can be a double-edged sword. For one, it is a
good thing for a talk to be polished, but not to be
too polished. One quirk of
the economics profession is the sort of countersignaling wherein we tend to
put a bit too much stock in appearances, to the point where between a
speaker wearing a suit and tie and one wearing jeans and a Led Zeppelin t-
shirt,
ceteris paribus, the former will tend to be viewed with suspicion
(“What is he compensating for by wearing a suit and tie?”) and the latter
with an endearing attitude reserved for eccentric geniuses. Similarly with
over-polished talks, which can give people the impression that you do not
value your time. This is admittedly a small concern, and one that is not
first-order, but it is nevertheless a concern in highly competitive
environments.
Should you choose to practice your talk, the best way to do that is in
front of other researchers, perhaps in the context of a brown-bag with other
graduate students or of a seminar at your own institution. Failing to do that,
practicing in front of an imaginary audience (or an online audience
consisting of colleagues who owe you a favor) will have to do. Time
yourself, either by using your phone’s timer, or maybe even going so far as
setting alarms at specific points (for instance by giving yourself five- and
three-minute warnings). If you can record yourself practicing your talk, that
can help you fix some of the things that might be annoying (most of us rely
on verbal quirks and tics that we fail to notice in everyday conversation,
and which can be really distracting).
Dostları ilə paylaş: