Figure 13.
Schematic overview of a Falling Weight Deflectometer and its components
(Doré and Zubeck, 2008).
The magnitude and the shape of the deflection basin under a given load pulse can be
used as a representative for the material properties of pavement system layers and their
overall stiffness. It is generally accepted that deflections at some distance from the plate
load centre may be correlated to the deformation at a corresponding depth beneath the
road surface (Mork, 1990). This denotes that deflections close to the centre of the load
plate reflect the material properties of the pavement layers, while deflections sufficiently
away from the load centre only reflect the subgrade properties.
Generally, the data from FWD measurements is analysed at two different levels: the
first level of analysis includes deflection basin analysis or deflection basin shape
indicators. These indices are good indicators for a fast and preliminary assessment of
the pavement structure and to sort out the weak sections along the road. The seasonal
climatic effects on pavement overall response and material stiffness can generally be
perceived using the deflection bowl and deflection basin indices. For instance, in
pavements exposed to freeze and thaw cycles, depending on the thawing progression in
the pavement structure, the deflection basin changes in both the shape and the size
(Simonsen, 1999). In early spring, the pavement is in a fully frozen state, the deflection
basin is narrow and the measured deflections are very small. As thawing penetrates the
pavement structure, the deflection basin widens and increases in depth. The maximum
basin deflection is observed at the end of the spring-thaw period or within a few days
after the thawing is completed, in which the subgrade is usually in a very wet condition.
The second level of FWD data analysis includes estimation of the stiffness or resilient
modulus of the pavement layers through backcalculation procedures. This is a more
advanced procedure that is usually used in the mechanistic based evaluation of
pavement structures. This technique applies the multi-layer elastic theory and models.
26
In backcalculation, the FWD impact load, pavement structure layer thicknesses, material
Poisson’s ratio and the measured surface deflections are assigned as the inputs of the
procedure. Using the multi-layer elastic theory, a set of pavement layer moduli that
would theoretically produce the measured deflection basin with a certain level of errors
is determined. The backcalculation is an iterative procedure from the simple equivalent
thickness approach to more sophisticated approaches that apply least-square
optimization methods.
It should be noted that special concerns should be taken into account when performing
backcalculation on pavements that are exposed to significant environmental variations
such as moisture content variations due to groundwater fluctuations or pavements that
are exposed to frost-thaw actions. Conduction quality backcalculation regarding these
pavements usually requires substantial information on depth to the frozen layers, the
temperature gradient of the asphalt concrete layer, moisture distribution within the
unbound layers and depth the groundwater and/or bedrock. For this purpose,
pavement instrumentation can be taken as collecting data on the climatic condition of
pavement structures and their induced stresses. Pavement instrumentation and intensive
data collection can be a valuable enhancement for a better understanding of factors
influencing pavement behaviour and response and both their short term and long term
impacts. However, intensive data collection, management and analyses are usually
expensive and time consuming and therefore are mainly limited to research purposes.
Stress dependent behaviour of pavement unbound material from field measurements
The nonlinear stress dependent behaviour of pavement unbound materials has
traditionally been determined from laboratory-based studies using RLT testing due to its
manageability and relative simplicity as well as time and cost efficiency. Even though
RLT testing is designed to simulate the internal in situ loading and environmental
condition of pavement materials and subgrade soils, it might still not be fully capable of
reproducing the internal structure, overburden pressure and traffic induced stress states
(Karasahin et al., 1993; Ke et al., 2000).
Non-destructive testing such as FWD and Seismic Pavement Analyser (SPA)
measurements are probably the most effective methods to capture the in situ behaviour
and response of pavement materials and structures. FWD measurements and
backcalculation of pavement layer moduli are in particular cost efficient and
well-recognised methods for structural evaluation of pavement systems that are widely
used by the road authorities. The ability of the FWD to stimulate traffic loading, its
mobility and capacity to collect large amounts of data at network level have gained
interest among the pavement community for more advanced analysis of FWD data.
This is along the path towards development of mechanistic-empirical design framework
for pavement systems that requires improved knowledge about the materials, climatic
factors, geometry and traffic on pavements structural response and performance.
27
Even though most pavement unbound materials exhibit nonlinear stress dependent
behaviour, they are traditionally treated as linear elastic materials in backcalculation of
FWD data. A majority of the backcalculation programs apply the simplified multilayer
linear elastic theory to backcalculate pavement layer stiffness. However, realistic
analyses of deflection data may require more advanced backcalculation techniques that
account for material nonlinearity.
Over the years, several studies have been conducted to evaluate the nonlinearity of
pavement material from deflection basins. Uzan (2004) applied both linear and
nonlinear procedures to analyse the FWD data obtained from an instrumented test site
in Hanover, New Hampshire. In his study, the backcalculation of the data exhibited
superior fit to the deflection bowl when the nonlinear approach was implemented in
comparison with the linear approach. This was in agreement with the stress and strain
measurements from the site instrumentation that also confirmed the nonlinear response
of the pavement material.
Meshkani et al. (2003) investigated the feasibility of backcalculating flexible pavement
layer nonlinear parameters from FWD and SPA testing. They used four hypothetical
pavement sections with nonlinear base and subgrade materials to study the feasibility
and accuracy of backcalculating the nonlinear parameters from deflection bowls.
Although nonlinear parameters for thinner pavement structures could be estimated,
they concluded that in many cases the deflection bowl did not provide sufficient
information to reliably backcalculate the nonlinear parameters.
Steven et al. (2007) modelled a thin-surfaced flexible pavement structure that was
instrumented with strain gauges and pressure cells using the Finite Element (FE)
method in ABAQUS computer code. In their FE model, both the granular layer
(anisotropic) and subgrade (isotropic) were modelled using the generalized nonlinear
constitutive model as expressed in Equation 3. The material model parameters used in
the FE model were obtained from RLT testing. They calibrated their model so that the
measured and calculated stresses and strains levels agreed within the acceptable
tolerance. The computed surface deflection from the FE model and the surface
deflections measured FWD at the test section showed an excellent match for all the
FWD load levels. They concluded that a fully nonlinear pavement model can realistically
represent the response of the pavement structure during the FWD tests. A similar
conclusion was also made in a study conducted by Uzan (1994).
In 2005, Li and Baus conducted a full-scale static and cyclic plate load test to investigate
the mechanical properties of unbound granular materials and the effect of moisture
content. Based on the plate load measurements, they developed a procedure to
backcalculate the material nonlinear parameters of the
k
model that was
implemented in the algorithm.
|