Forestry practices that maintain genetic diversity over the longer term will be required as an integral component of sustainable forest management



Yüklə 0.55 Mb.
səhifə11/11
tarix19.08.2017
ölçüsü0.55 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11



  1. Sniezko, R.A. 2006. Resistance breeding against nonnative pathogens in forest trees – current successes in North America. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 28: S270–S279.

  2. Soja AJ, Tchebakova NM, French NHF, Flannigan MD, Shugart HH, Stocks BJ, Sukhinin AI, Parfenova EI, Chapin III FS, and Stackhouse Jr. PW, 2007. Climate-induced boreal forest change: Predictions versus current observations. Global and Planetary Change, 56: 274–296.

  3. Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, Bell CD, Paterson AH, Zheng C, Sankoff D, dePamphilis CW, Kerr Wall P, and Soltis PS, 2009. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. American Journal of Botany

  4. 96: 336-348.

  5. Sosef MSM, Hong LT, and Prawirohatmodjo S, (Editors), 1998. Plant Resources of South-East Asia No. 5(3) Timber trees: Lesser-known timbers. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, the Netherlands.

  6. Southwood TRE, Wint GRW, Kennedy CEJ, and Greenwood SR, 2004. Seasonality, abundance, species richness and specificity of the phytophagous guild of insects on oak (Quercus) canopies. Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 43-50.

  7. Spencer DJ, Eldridge KG and Matheson AC, 1999. CONSERVE: Strategies for Conserving the Genetic Resources of Pinus radiata outside California and Mexico. Proc CONSERVE Workshop, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 6 October 1998. CSIRO Australia, 23pp.

  8. Stacy EA, Hamrick JL, Nason JD, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, and Condit R, 1996. Pollen dispersal in low-density populations of three neotropical tree species. The American Naturalist, 148: 275-298.

  9. Steenkamp ET, Rodas CA, Kvas M, Wingfield MJ, 2012. Fusarium circinatum and pitch canker of Pinus in Colombia. Australasian Plant Pathology, 41: 483-491

  10. Stephens JMC, 2006. The factors responsible for the varying levels of UMF® in manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey. PhD Thesis, The University of Waikato, New Zealand.

  11. Styles BT, 1972. The flower biology of the Meliaceae and its bearing on tree breeding. -Silvae Genetica, 21: 175-182.

  12. Sunilkumar KK, and Sudhakara K, 1998. Effect of temperature, media and fungicides on the storage behaviour of Hopea parviflora seeds. Seed Science and Technology 26: 781-797.

  13. Tang CQ, Yang Y, Ohsawa M, Yi S-R, Momohara A, Su W-H, Wang H-C, Zhang Z-Y, Peng M-C, and Wu Z-L, 2012. Evidence for the persistence of wild Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgoaceae) populations in the Dalou Mountains, southwestern China. Am. J. Bot. August 2012, 99:1408-1414.

  14. Templeton A, 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. Pp. 3-27 in D. Otte and J. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

  15. Theilade I, Graudal L, and Kjær E, (eds.). 2000. Conservation of the genetic resources of Pinus merkusii in Thailand. DFSC Technical Note No. 58, Royal Forest Department (RFD),Thailand/Forest Genetic Resources and Management Project (FORGENMAP), Thailand/FA.



  1. Theilade I, and Petri L, 2003. Conservation of tropical trees ex situ through storage and use Guidelines and Technical Notes No 65, Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebæk, Denmark.

  2. The Plant List, 2012. http://www.theplantlist.org Accessed during October-November, 2012.

  3. Thaman RR, 2008. Pacific Island agrobiodiversity and ethnobiodiversity: a foundation for sustainable Pacific Island life. Biodiversity 9, 102–110.

  4. Thomas CD, et al. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145-148.

  5. Thompson ID, Mackey B, McNulty S and Mosseler A, 2009. Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Technical Series no. 43. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

  6. Thompson ID, Okabe K, Tylianakis JM, Kumar P, Brockerhoff EG, Schellhorn N, Parrotta JA, and Nasi R, 2011. The role of forest biodiversity in delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy. BioScience 61: 972-981.

  7. Thompson ID, et al. 2012. Forest biodiversity, carbon and other ecosystem services: relationships and impacts of deforestation and forest degradation. Pp 21-50 Ch 2 in Understanding Relationships between Biodiversity, Carbon, Forests and People: The Key to Achieving REDD+ Objectives. A Global Assessment Report. Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on Biodiversity, Forest Management, and REDD+. IUFRO World Series Volume 31. Vienna.

  8. Thomson LAJ, Morris JD, and Halloran GM 1987. Salt tolerance in eucalypts. In: Rana, R.S., ed., Afforestation of salt-affected soils. Proceedings International Symposium, Karnal. India, Vol. 3, 1-12.

  9. Thomson LAJ, 2004. Management of natural forests for conservation of forest genetic resources. Pp 13-44 in Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol. 2: In managed natural forests and protected areas (in situ). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.

  10. Thomson LAJ, and Theilade I, 2004. Protected areas and their role in conservation of forest genetic resources. Pp 45-65 in Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol. 2: In managed natural forests and protected areas (in situ). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.

  11. Thomson LAJ, Englberger L, Guarino L, Thaman RR, and Elevitch C, 2006. Pandanus tectorius (pandanus), ver. 1.1. Pp 563-590 In: C.R. Elevitch (ed.). Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR), Holualoa, Hawai‘i/

  12. Thomson LAJ, 2006. Santalum austrocaledonicum and S. yasi (sandalwood), ver. 1.1. Pp 675-694 In:

  13. C.R. Elevitch (ed.). Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR), Holualoa, Hawai‘i/

  14. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Sykes MT, and Araújo MB, 2006. Using niche-based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe. Diversity and Distributions, 1:, 49-60.

  15. Tomaru N, Takahashi M, Tsumura Y, Takahashi M and Ohba K, 1998. Intraspecific Variation and Phylogeographic Patterns of Fagus crenata (Fagaceae) Mitochondrial DNA. American Journal of Botany 85: 629-636.



  1. Tommasi F, and Scaramuzzi F, 2004. In vitro propagation of Ginkgo biloba by using various bud cultures. Biol. Plant. 48:297–300.

  2. Trotter RT III, Cobb NS, and Whitham TG, 2008. Arthropod community diversity and trophic structure: a comparison between extremes of plant stress. Ecological Entomology, 33: 1-11

  3. Tuisese S, _ulai P, Evo T, Singh K, Jiko L, Faka‘osi T, Napa‘a S, Havea M, and Thomson L!J/ 2000/ ! strategy

  4. for conserving, managing and better utilising the genetic resources of Santalum yasi (sandalwood) in the Kingdom on Tonga and Republic of Fiji. Report prepared by Department of Forestry, Fiji, Forestry and Conservation Division, Tonga and SPRIG, Canberra, Australia.

  5. Vaillancourt RE, Petty A, and McKinnon EG, 2004. Maternal inheritance of mitochondria in Eucalyptus globulus. Journal of Heredity 95: 353–355.

  6. Valladares S, Toribo M, Celestino C, and Vietez AM, 2004. Cryopreservation of embryogenic cultures from mature Quercus suber trees using vitrification CryoLetters 25: 177-186.

  7. Van Zonneveld M, Koskela J, Vinceti B, and Jarvis A, 2009a. Impact of climate change on the distribution of tropical pines in Southeast Asia. Unasylva 60: 24-29.

  8. Van Zonneveld M, Jarvis A, Dvorak W, Lema G, Leibing C, 2009b. Climate change Impact predictions on Pinus patula and Pinus tecunumanii populations in Mexico and Central America. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1566-1576.

  9. Vercoe T, and Clarke B, 1994. Trial growth performance of Eucalyptus urophylla S.T. Blake : report to FAO Forestry Division on the growth of Eucalyptus urophylla in international provenance trials and other comparative growth trials. Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT. 56 pp.

  10. Viart M, 1988. Mini-monographie sur Populus euphratica (Fr). [Mini-monograph on Populus euphratica]. FAO Commission Internationale du Peuplier. Sess. 18. Beijing, China. 9 pp.

  11. Vivero JL, Szejner M, Gordon J, and Magin G, 2006. The red list of trees of Guatemala. 75 pp.

  12. Vivero JL, Kelbessa E, and Demissew S., 2011. The red list of endemic trees and shrubs of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Produced by the Global Trees Campaign under the auspices of the IUCN/SSC Global Tree Specialist Group. Fauna and Flora International, Cambridge, UK. 28 pp.

  13. Vutilolo IVN, Tyagi AP, Thomson LAJ, and Heads M, 2005. Comparison of performance of whitewood (Endospermum medullosum L. S. Smith) provenances and families in Vanuatu. The South Pacific Journal of Natural Science 23: 37 – 42.

  14. Wagner DB, 1992. Nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms as biochemical markers in population genetic analyses of forest trees. New Forests 6: 373-90.

  15. Walker BH, 1992. Biological diversity and ecological redundancy. Cons. Biol. 6: 18-23.

  16. Ward M, Dick CW, Gribel R, and Lowe AJ, 2005. To self, or not to self... A review of outcrossing and pollen-mediated gene flow in neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 246–254.

  17. Watt MP, Thokoane NL, Mycock D, and Blakeway F, 2000. In vitro storage of Eucalyptus grandis germplasm under minimal growth conditions Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 61: 161-164

  18. White EE, 1990. Chloroplast DNA in Pinus monticola 2. Surveys of within species variability and detection of heteroplasmic individuals. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79: 251-5.

  19. Whitham TG, et al. 2006. A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews, Genetics 7: 511-523.

  20. Whitmore TC, 1976. Natural variation and its taxonomic treatment within tropical tree species as seen in the Far East. In: Burley, J. and B.T. Styles (eds.). Tropical trees: Variation, Breeding and Conservation. Linnaean Society, London.

  21. Whittemore AT, and Olsen RT, 2011. Ulmus americana (Ulmaceae) is polyploid complex. Am. J. Bot. 98(4): 754-760.

  22. Williams CG, Zhou Y, and Hall SE, 2001. A chromosomal region promoting outcrossing in a conifer. Genetics 159: 1283–1289.

  23. Wills C, Condit R, Foster RB, and Hubbell SP, 1997. Strong density-and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S. A. 94: 1252–1257.

  24. Winfree R, and Kremen C, 2009. Are ecosystem services stabilized by differences among species? A test using crop pollination. Proc. Roy. Soc. Biol. Sci. B. 276 (1655): 220-237.

  25. Wright JW, and Baldwin HI, 1957. The International Union Scotch pine provenance tests in New Hampshire. Silvae Genetica 6:2-14.

  26. WCSP, 2012. 'World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet; http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/ Retrieved November 2012.

  27. Wood BW, and Grauke LJ, 2010. The rare-earth metallome of pecan and other Carya Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 136: 389-398.

  28. Wullschleger SD, Weston DJ, DiFazio SP and Tuskan GA 2012. Revisiting the sequencing of the first tree genome: Populus trichocarpa. Tree Physiology doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps081.

  29. Xie C-Y, 2008. Ten-year results from red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.) provenance-progeny testing and their implications for genetic improvement. New Forests. 36: 273-284.

  30. Yachi S, and Loreau M, 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 1463-1468.

  31. Yampolski C, and Yampolski H, 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibl. Genet

  32. 3: 1-62.

  33. Yen DE, 1974. Arboriculture in the subsistence of Santa Cruz, Solomon Islands. Economic Botany, 28(3):247284.



  1. Young AG, Boshier DH, and Boyle TJ, 2000. Forest conservation genetics: principles and practices. CSIRO, Collingwood, Australia. 352 pp.



  1. Zhang L-B, Simmons MP, and Renner SS, 2007. A phylogeny of Anisophylleaceae based on six nuclear and plastid loci: Ancient disjunctions and recent dispersal between South America, Africa, and Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 1057–1067.



1 Polyploids in conifers include Sequioa sempervirens (hexaploid) and Fiztroya cupressoides (tetraploid) – see for a review of polyploidy in gymnosperms see Ahuja (2005)

2 Populus trichocarpa has been determined to have 41,335 loci containing protein-coding transcripts (http://www.phytozome.net/poplar; accessed 9 March 2013).

3 The species may die out in the wild due to the recent introduction of the virulent root rot pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi, but is well conserved globally ex situ by a successful campaign to promote its use as an ornamental.

4 Byrne 2008; Butcher et al. 1999; Gandara 1996; Hamrick and Murawski 1990; Kitamura et al. 1994; Lepsch-Cunha et al. 2001ab; Mandal et al. 1994, Moran et al. 1989. Muluvi et al. 2004; Murawski and Hamrick, 1991; Murawski and Bawa 1994; Murawski et al. 1994ab-Murawski, 1995-Nason and Hamrick, 1997-O’Malley and _awa 1987-Olng’otie 1991-Sebbenn 2000-Stacey et al. 1996; Ward et al.2005.

5 Forest cover is a crude measure of FGR conservation as, at either extreme, forests may range from well-connected, highly biodiverse, well-managed tree-species rich communities, with limited immediate threats to their integrity, and which conserve substantial amounts of FGR through to clonal monocultures which have no meaningful FGR conservation role.

6 The UN’s 2012 Millennium Development Goal report estimates that, despite progress in eradication of extreme poverty, almost 1 Billion people will be living on an income below USD 1.25 per day in 2015, while FAO estimated that 850 Million people (or 15/5% of the world’s population) was living in hunger in the period 2006-8.


7 The current global population of around 7 billion is projected to reach 9.3 billion by 2050, according to the medium variant of the 2010 Revision of World Population Prospects.

8 According to the World Bank’s 2002 strategy on Sustaining Forests, there are about 60 million people (mainly

indigenous and tribal groups) are almost wholly dependent on forests, and some 350 million people who live within or adjacent to dense forests depend on them to a high degree for subsistence and income.



9 The United Nations Population Fund has described how the movement of people from rural to urban areas has contributed to the explosive growth of cities around the globe, whereby in 2008, for the first time in history, more than half of the world’s population was living in towns and cities.

10 Trees outside of forests in non-agricultural land use systems, such as urban landscapes, also may comprise important FGR but are considered to be outside of the scope of this first SWR-FGR.

11 In the case of Cook Islands forested landscapes such as dominate the main island of Rarotonga, are vital for water catchment and tourism. The type of tree cover is less important as use of local timbers for wood carving has almost disappeared, but important NWFPs such as maile (Alyxia stellata) for leis and herbal medicines may still be gathered, and endemic forest species may require particular tree species for their survival.

12 By well characterized it is meant the growth and adaptability attributes, including genotype by environment interactions, and the type and quality of end products and/ or services that they will be able to provide.

13 This includes large woody shrubs attaining more than 2-3 m in height, given that the unclear boundary between trees and woody shrubs, and that individual species may exist as either trees or shrubs depending on environmental factors

14 The IUCN Red list included is widely regarded as the most comprehensive, objective global approach for evaluating the conservation status of plant and animal species
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə