Guideline Development Group


Table 3: Grades Of Recommendation For Action Statements



Yüklə 0,54 Mb.
səhifə45/46
tarix25.12.2016
ölçüsü0,54 Mb.
#2801
1   ...   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46

Table 3: Grades Of Recommendation For Action Statements


Grade

Recommendation

Quality Of Evidence

A

Strong

A preponderance of level I studies, but at least 1

level I study directly on the topic supports the recommendation.



B

Moderate

A preponderance of level II studies, but at least 1 level II study directly on the topic supports the recommendation.

C

Weak

A single level II study at <25% critical appraisal scores or a preponderance of level III and IV studies, including consensus statements by content experts support the recommendation.

D

Theoretical/

Foundational



A preponderance of evidence from animal or cadaver studies, from conceptual/theoretical models/principles, or from basic science/bench research, or published expert opinion in peer-reviewed journals supports the recommendation.

P

Best practice

Recommended practice based on current clinical practice norms, exceptional situations where validating studies have not or cannot be performed, and there is a clear benefit, harm or cost, and/or the clinical experience of the guideline development group.

R

Research

An absence of research on the topic, or conclusions from higher-quality studies on the topic are in disagreement. The recommendation is based on these conflicting conclusions or absent studies.



Yüklə 0,54 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin