I t is true that some people argue that not all the prisoners are supposed to do volunteering helping society instead of keeping them in cells

I t is true that some people argue that not all the prisoners are supposed to do volunteering helping society instead of keeping them in cells. While I believe it is reasonable for criminals to be kept in prisons, I completely agree that they should be forced to do community work.

On the one hand, it seems sensible for many people that prisoners are usually kept in jail because of their serious crimes. Firstly, extreme criminals will be no longer a thread for the society during their lives in a prison, and their future crimes will be prevented. Secondly, most criminals will have enough time to regret being conscious of how their crimes threaten to the society. Finally, for those who do not obey laws set by governments, sentenced offenders will be a good example to avoid lawbreaking. For example, as death penalty is imposed by laws, crime rates, in particular murder cases are decreasing in China.
On the other hand, just keeping prisoners would be counterproductive for not only themselves, but also governments. First and foremost, a few criminals can have a tendency to commit a suicide in jails if they are separated from the community. Unless offenders do community work and socialize, they start to feel themselves undervalued and disregarded, which can cause them to be demotivated. Aside from that, governments can save money not paying employees for building public amenities or local hospitals with the compulsory employment of prisoners. Another reason is that some criminals prone to destroy their spirituality struggle to harmonize themselves after coming out of prisons.
In conclusion, I would argue that some prisoners should do community service to benefit for governments and not to be a caveman after prisoning, and not all criminals, however, do community work.


In today`s world, crimes are playing an indigestible part in our life. It is true that some people argue that the number of crime cases across the world is witnessing a decrease because of technological advancements which are considered crime-preventing. I completely agree that thanks to progress in technology, crimes has started to decrease.
One the one hand, it is apparent that the number of crimes has started to decrease. The one notable reason is that digital database is usually established, which complete information can be found on one particular crime case. For instance, The International police, INTERPOL, is assisting governments to find clear information about criminals and connect police officials in unison. Another reason is that technological devices are enormously beneficial that can easily detect fingerprints left by criminals. This results in disclosing serious and hard-to-define criminal acts. Moreover, criminals are no longer able to hide themselves by cleansing the results of their crimes.
On the other hand, it is widely accepted that technology is causing crimes to decrease. Firstly, many police departments are often provided with contemporary devices, such as GPS appliances, robotic cameras and lie detectors. These devices have a number functions that can help police officers to uncover crimes. For example, with the help of GPS, criminals, such as thieves and murders can be found with no efforts. Additionally, apart from being used by policemen in order to watch for and catch criminals, robotic cameras are so prevalent that a majority of people are deploying them to detect robbers and attackers.
In conclusion, I completely agree that the rate of crimes is experiencing a significant decrease owing to technological devices including lie detectors and digital databank of criminal acts.

Due to technology , digital data about crime cases are usually formed interpol all around the world

Finger prints easy to notice . technologilcal devices
Connected
Criminal acts GPS bn find, kuzatadi
Hd cameras who commited crime