J O U R N A L O F WO U N D C A R E Vo l 2 2 . N o 1 . E W M A D o c u M E N t 2 0 1 3
Biobag
Alternatively, the net bag is available, called a
‘biobag’, which contains the larvae, prevents
escape and reduces the ‘yuk factor’ for nurses/
patients who sometimes are hesitant in using
them. Depending on the size of the wound,
one biobag, containing live, sterile maggots and
foam beads in a net bag, is placed directly on the
wound bed. The biobag is placed directly onto
the sloughy/necrotic tissue. The peri-wound skin
is protected with zinc paste, or a hydrocollid
dressing, to reduce irritation to skin.
90
There is little difference in outcomes between
loose or bagged larvae, although for wounds
around toes or crevices, loose larvae may be
more beneficial.
75,91
However, Dumville et al.
82
reported that, although time for debridement
was quicker in the loose group, overall time to
healing did not differ between loose or bagged
groups. Patients demonstrated no preference over
loose or bagged larvae,
75,84
with patients reporting
that ulcer healing, and reducing pain, odour and
exudate were of greater priority than the choice of
larvae. Spilsbury et al.
84
reported that a minority
of females over 70 years old (8/35 women, 23%)
had a negative view of larval therapy and would
refuse to consider it as a treatment option.
However, they argue that information given prior
to therapy is of importance and can influence
patient acceptance of therapy.
Benefits
Larval therapy is a cost-effective debriding
treatment,
80,92
which can reduce pain, bacteria
and malodour, while promoting wound healing
with little or no side effects.
80
One of the major
advantages of larval therapy is that the maggots
separate the necrotic tissue from live tissue,
allowing for an easier surgical debridement.
78
The
therapy can be easily applied in any environment
(inpatient/outpatient) and can be left in place
for 48–72 hours.
78
Newer biobags, where larvae
are contained in a net bag, may make it easier to
contain larvae and may also be more aesthetically
pleasing to both staff and patients.
33
Contraindications
Larvae are contraindicated for use near eyes, upper
gastrointestinal tract and upper respiratory tract,
and patients with reported allergy to fly larvae,
brewer’s yeast or soy-bean protein.
93
In addition,
larval therapy is not suitable for wounds with
exposed blood vessels potentially connecting
to deep vital organs,
94
patients with decreased
perfusion, or in malignant (cancer) wounds.
Caution must be taken that wounds are never
allowed to close over larvae, intentionally or
otherwise. Care should be taken if the patient has
a known risk, or a bleeding disorder, and it may be
necessary to use antibiotics in conjunction with
the therapy, particularly if P. aeruginosa is present.
84
Larval therapy should not be utilised in areas of
the body subject to pressure, as larvae may become
squashed and suffocate.
33
There is the potential to
drown the larvae in the presence of heavy exudate.
‘
Inrecentyears,larvaltherapy
isre-emerging,duetotherise
inchronicwoundsandthe
emergenceofantibiotic-resistant
strainsofbacteria,suchasMRSA
’
|