Dull, adj
Uninteresting, monotonous, boring; e.g. a dull book, a dull film.
Slow in understanding, stupid; e.g. a dull student.
Not clear or bright; e.g. dull (пасмурная) weather, dull day.
Not loud or distinct; e.g. a dull (глухой) sound.
Not sharp; e.g. a dull knife.
Yet, one distinctly feels that there is something that all these meanings have in common, and that is the implication of deficiency, be it of colour (m. III), wits (m. II), interest (m. I), sharpness (m. V). The implication of insufficient quality, of something lacking, can be clearly distinguished in each separate meaning.
The scheme of the semantic structure of dull shows that the centre holding together the complex semantic structure of this word is not one of the meanings but a certain component that can be singled out within each separate meaning. This brings us to the second level of analysis of the semantic structure of a word. The semantic structure of the word is “divisible” not only at the level of different meanings but, also, at a deeper level.
Each separate meaning seems to be subject to structural analysis in which it may be represented as sets of semantic components. In terms of componential analysis, one of the modern methods of semantic research, the meaning of a word is defined as a set of elements of meaning which are not part of the vocabulary of the language itself, but rather theoretical elements.
Therefore, the semantic structure of a word should be investigated at both these levels: a) of different meanings, b) of semantic components within each separate meaning. For a monosemantic word (i.e. a word with one meaning) the first level is excluded.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |