Microsoft Word josefinfinalversion docx

5.3 Benefits with the Interactive Whiteboard 
The participants in this study mentioned a few different aspects with the IWB, which they 
found beneficial for ELT and the pupils’ language learning that possibly affected the 
participants’ incorporation and usage of the IWB in ELT in a positive way. One of the factors 
was the positive motivational effect the IWB had on the pupils. The responses showed that 
the pupils had a positive attitude towards the IWB and the teachers’ integration of the IWB 
made the pupils more actively involved and engaged in the classroom activities. The 
interactivity the IWB generated through activities from websites were more exciting for the 
pupils than the exercises in different textbooks since the several functions and possibility to 
bring everything on the web into the classroom in a convenient way created a more varied 
learning experience, which according to the participants made the learning of English more 
enjoyable for both the pupils and teacher. Furthermore, the participants mentioned different 
websites such as Kahoot and Answergarden and claimed that the interactive activities that 
could be found on these websites had a positive effect on the pupils’ participation and 
engagement in ELT. Also Hubbard (2009:2) mentions that the main benefit with CALL is that 
it engages pupils in activities and makes them enjoy the learning process more (Hubbard, 
2009: 2), which agrees with the results from this study. Moreover, an assumption is that there 
is a connection between the motivational effects the IWB has on pupils and how the IWB 

---

35
supports all learning-styles. According to the responses, the IWB was helpful and beneficial 
for all pupils, no matter what learning-styles they preferred or what level of knowledge they 
were on. The responses imply that the way the IWB can connect all language skills in one 
single activity and support all learning-styles made it easier for the teacher to satisfy all 
pupils’ needs in a more convenient way. This might create a better level of listening 
comprehension among the pupils and generate a higher number of enthusiastic pupils. Just 
like Ellis (1997) claims, all people learn a new language in different ways (Ellis, 1997) and 
since the IWB supports all learning-styles (Glover et al, 2005) this might be the reason for the 
IWB’s positive effect on the pupils increased motivation on language learning, which is 
something the participants mention in the responses as a benefit with the IWB. Furthermore, 
the responses also indicate that the IWB facilitates teaching. The IWB made it possible for the 
teacher to bring the wide range of material from the web into the classroom and teach the 
whole-class at the same time in a clear and visible way. The participants stated that the 
teacher does not have to walk around and teach or explain something to each and every pupil 
in the classroom; in this way the IWB saves time for the teacher. This is something that 
Hubbard (2009:2) also mentions to be beneficial with CALL, he uses the term Institutional 
efficiency, which means that the pupils require less teacher time when the IWB is used 
effectively in the classroom (Hubbard, 2009:2).
Furthermore, the primary benefit with the IWB, which was mentioned repeated times in the 
responses, is the visual clarity the IWB creates for all pupils, within the context of the 
communicative classroom. There is a comparable parallel between this and the fact that the 
IWB supports all learning-styles. This is assumed to be the main reason for the participants’ 
positive attitude and integration of the IWB in ELT. According to the participants everything 
could be explained and demonstrated in a clearer way through the IWB. Useful examples 
could be shown on the board to make an activity, exercise or instruction etc, more clearly to 
the learners. Looking at the responses it is obvious that the IWB was beneficial within all 
areas in ELT, however, the participants specifically mentioned grammar and structure as areas 
where they found the IWB most beneficial. The visual clarity the IWB creates made it easier 
for the teachers to teach grammar by focusing learners’ attention on form. For instance, the 
participants mentioned that the teacher and pupils could in whole-class go through a text on 
the IWB and discuss how it could be improved and then together change and move around 
words and sentences on the board. This demonstrates how the IWB can put exercises into 
context, supporting form-focused teaching. Additionally, there seems to be a similarity 

---

36
between the participants’ responses about the IWB’s clarity and what Condie et al. (2007:5) 
argue about the IWB, where they claim that the IWB makes concrete examples out of abstract 
concepts through images (Condie et al. 2007:5). Also, Harmer (2008) emphasise that 
meaning-based exercises are beneficial for language learning (Harmer, 2008).
Thus, there are a few different factors that can affect teachers’ integration and usage of IWBs 
in ELT in positive and negative ways. These factors and the amount of time and training it 
takes for teachers to learn and use a new technology, such as the IWB, in teaching should be 
taken to account when analysing whether the integration of it has any affect on pupils’ 
attainment or not.

---

37
6. Conclusion 
The aim of this study was to investigate English Language teachers’ integration of the IWB in 
ELT in Sweden and to study what factors that determine English teachers’ usage of the IWB 
in ELT. Through qualitative interviews with English Language teachers at a lower secondary 
school in southern Sweden the aim of the study was reached. The result from the study shows 
that the IWB was frequently used in English classrooms at upper secondary level. However, it 
was most regularly used non-interactively. Furthermore, the result shows that there were 
some factors, which were determent for the participants’ integration of the IWB in ELT. The 
first one was attitude. The participants’ positive attitudes were the prominent factor that 
affected their integration of the IWB in a positive way. They saw the positive effects with the 
IWB and how it could be beneficial for both the teacher and the learners and therefore wanted 
to use it in their teaching. However, there were also some negative factors that were decisive 
factors for the participants’ incorporation of the IWB in ELT. These factors were time and