Ministry of higher education, science and innovations of the republic of uzbekistan termiz state university

The summary of the Chapter II.
The study of modern e-mail writing carried out in a synchronous plan showed that it is a multifaceted phenomenon of writing and speech activity of a person professionally connected with written speech. Based on the above analyzed materials, the following conclusions were made for this part of the study:

1. 
   The linguo-stylistic analysis of each of the email’s texts presented in the corpus made it possible to give a qualitative description of the linguistic means used by the author when compiling and writing a letter. These linguistic means were considered at the lexical, morphological, syntactic and stylistic levels. A detailed examination of all language units, their qualification proves that they form a specific system of language standards that serve the official business style, and confirmed the hypothesis that they form the genre of business writing and make it unique.
   
2. 
   At the same time, we observed that the personal moment in many non-standard letters (despite the recognition in linguistic theory of the absence of signs of subjectivity and emotionality in official written speech) is present in the choice of units of different levels when the communicative situation requires it.
   
3. 
   The study of linguistic means at the communicative level has led us to the possibility, on the one hand, to correlate their functional role in the text with the functions of communication, on the other hand, to designate, with their help, guidelines for highlighting the communicative intentions of the compiler of the text. As a result, an intentional analysis was made, which was significant for presenting the full characteristics of a business letter and updating the roles, functions and goals of written business communication, as well as building a typology of business letters.
   
4. 
   In a comparative aspect, the national specificity of a business letter was also considered. In this paper, we have presented a new look at the features of the English and Uzbek languages of e-mail writing, namely from the standpoint of evaluating the language means used in writing it by a representative of a linguistic culture. Using the example of a detailed analysis of the linguistic and intentional organization of a number of letters, we were able, as a result of comparing the contexts of letters belonging to the author-non-Uzbek linguistic personality, with similar contexts that would also characterize the general business style of the author-Uzbek linguistic personality, to single out private units of the Russian language that are unusual for this context, the appearance of which we explained by the personal-cultural linguistic character.
   
5. 
   On the whole, this study attempted to shed more light on various aspects that affect language use in workplace email communication in a multinational organization that uses English lingua franca as the language of communication.