Microsoft Word language assessment theory with practice



Yüklə 0,94 Mb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə39/39
tarix20.04.2023
ölçüsü0,94 Mb.
#101185
1   ...   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39
Hatipoluiler.2021.Chapter9AssessmentoflanguageskillsProductiveskills.InSevimInalandOyaTunaboyluEds.LanguageAssessmentTheorywithPracticepp.167-211.AnkaraNobel.

of Applied Linguistics7(2), 263-273. 
Sadler, D. R. (1998) Formative Assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in 
Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77-84, DOI: 10.1080/ 
0969595980050104 
Sawyer, R. J., Graham, S. & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, 
and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition 
skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of 
Educational Psychology84(3), 340-352. 
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné and 
M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39–83). 
Rand McNally 
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research
78(1), 153-189. 
Tsagari, D. (2011). Washback of a high-stakes English exam on teachers’ perceptions 
and practices. Selected Papers from the 19th ISTAL, 431-445. 
Tsagari, D. & Banerjee, J. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of second language assessment
DeGruyter Mouton. 
Tsagari, D. & Vogt, K. (2017). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers 
around Europe: Research, challenges and future prospects. Papers in Language 
Testing and Assessment6(1), 41-63. 
Tuckman, B. W. (1999, August). A tripartite model of motivation for achievement: 
Attitude/drive/strategy. A paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American 
Psychological Association, Boston, MA, “Motivational Factors Affecting Student 
Achievement—Current Perspectives”. 
Uluçay, Ç. & Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2017). Cause markers in Turkish cause paragraphs. In 
Çiler Hatipoğlu, Erdem Akbaş & Yasemin Bayyurt (Eds.), Metadiscourse across 
Genres: Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts (pp. 223-249)
Frankfurt: Peter Lang (ISBN: 978-3-631-72062-2). 
Uysal, H. H. (2008). Tracing the culture behind writing: Rhetorical patterns and 
bidirectional transfer in L1 and L2 essays of Turkish writers in relation to 
educational context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 183–207. 
Yang, M. & Carless, D. (2012). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic 
feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, iFirst, 1-14. 
Zimmermann, R. (2000). L2 writing: Subprocesses, a model of formulating and 
empirical findings. Learning and Instruction, 10, 73–99. doi: http:// dx.doi. 
org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00019-5 
Zulkifli, N. A. (2017). Designing Writing Assessment Tasks for Junior High School. 
Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching2(2), 127-143. 


Yüklə 0,94 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin