Section 1.5
The Importance of Language in Logic
however, is the difference we could experience if we took full advantage of clear and precise
language in its optimal form. One result could be that many will no longer ignore what we say.
Another could be that as our vocabulary expands, we will no longer be limited to what we can
express to others or in what we can grasp from our experiences.
Suppose, for example, that you are invited to a dinner that unbeknownst to you introduces
you to a spice you have never tasted before. As you savor the food on your plate, you may taste
something unfamiliar, but the new flavor may be too faint for you, amidst the otherwise famil-
iar flavors of the dish you are consuming. In fact, you may be cognitively unaware of the char-
acter of this new flavor because you are unable to identify it by name and, thus, as a new
flavor category in your experience.
According to philosopher David Hume (1757), many
of us do not have a sensitive enough palate to actually
recognize new or unfamiliar flavors in familiar taste
experiences. For those who do, it would seem that the
test of a sensitive palate lies not with strong flavors
but with faint ones. However, recent neurobiological
research suggests that our responses to taste are not
entirely dependent on the refinement of our sensory
properties but, rather, on higher levels of linguistic
processing (Grabenhorst, Rolls, & Bilderbeck, 2008).
In other words, if you cannot describe it, it may be
quite possible you are unable to taste it; our ability to
skillfully use language thus improves our experience.
Logicians and philosophers in general take lan-
guage very seriously because it is the best means for
expressing our thoughts, to be understood by others,
and to clarify ideas that are in need of clarification.
Communicating in a language, however, is more com-
plex than we recognize. As renowned philosopher
John Searle observed, “Speaking a language is engag-
ing in a rule-governed form of behavior” (Searle,
1969, p. 22). This means that whenever we talk or
write, we are performing according to specific rules.
Pauses in speech are represented by punctuation
marks such as commas or periods. If we do not pause,
the meaning of the same string of words could change its meaning completely. The same prin-
ciple applies in writing. But although we are more conscious of making such pauses in speech,
sometimes we overlook their importance in writing. A clever saying on a T-shirt illustrates this
point, and it reads as follows:
Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.
Commas save lives.
Georgios Kollidas/iStock/Thinkstock
Dostları ilə paylaş: