South African Journal of Geomatics, Vol. 3, No. 1, January 2014
67
for their own use (EIS, 2000; Kurwakumire and Chaminama, 2012) while
there is minimum formal
sharing of this information. As a result, there is duplication of information as organisations collect
similar information. Also, huge amounts of land information are available but inaccessible as there
is no metadata catalogue which can specify which organisation has what information. With
communal land there is poor land information as only the village and
ward boundaries have been
demarcated (Kurwakumire and Chaminama, 2012). The systems in use by the Department of the
Surveyor General and municipalities are still paper based (Kurwakumire, 2007, 2013a, 2013b) and
are largely inefficient. This study puts into perspective the role of a digital
cadastre in improving
land management and good land governance though improved availability and access to
information. This, in turn becomes one way into democratisation of land information (Sawicki and
Craig, 1996; Kurwakumire, 2013a) which is primarily public information.
This research points out
some technical and software specifications that can be employed towards implementation of a
digital cadastre and strategies to improve spatial data collection.
Dostları ilə paylaş: