Effect of microelements (B, Zn) on Cotton plant's productivity, its leaf area and plant height. Abstract
Yüklə 0,56 Mb. Pdf görüntüsü
|
|
100
+Zn 0.02% 62,1 454,2 1024,4 4671,3 N 200 P 140 K 100 +Zn 0.05% 54,2 453,3 1103,2 4569,4 N 200 P 140 K 100 +KUPRUMXIT +NANOSEREBRO 66,7 494,6 1209,2 4779,2 N 200 P 140 K 100 +PMK XZ-Co 2+ 61,3 453,7 1071,7 4687,8 N 200 P 140 K 100 +KUPRUMXIT 53,6 438,9 1203,6 4612,6 N 250 P 175 K 125 +B 0.02% 60,7 451,9 1265,7 4659,9 N 250 P 175 K 125 +B 0.05% 57,6 447,7 1221,4 4607,7 N 250 P 175 K 125 +Zn 0.02% 61,2 452,3 1230,6 4652,4 N 250 P 175 K 125 +Zn 0.05% 53,8 450,2 1221,2 4645,1 N 250 P 175 K 125 +KUPRUMXIT +NANOSEREBRO 70,9 532,3 1469,6 5098,7 N 200 P 175 K 125 +PMK XZ-Co 2+ 62,3 461,3 1261,3 4780,8 N 250 P 175 K 125 +KUPRUMXIT 64,8 524,2 1311,9 4906,2 In the period of 3-4 leaves, the assimilation surface formed by leaves in the control variant was 47.6 cm2, in the 1st variant, the assimilation surface formed by leaves was 55.4 cm2, in the 2nd variant, the assimilation surface formed by leaves was 49.2 cm2, and in the 3rd variant, leaves the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 62.1 cm2, and in the 4th option the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 54.2 cm2, and in the 5th option the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 66.7 cm2, and in the 6th option the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 61.3 cm2 , and in the 7th option, the absorptive surface created by the leaves was 53.6 cm2, and in the 8th option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 60.7 cm2, and in the 9th option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 57.6 cm2, and in the 10th option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves absorption surface was 61.2 cm2, and in option 11, the absorption surface created by leaves was 53.8 cm2, and in option 12, the absorption surface created by leaves was 70.9 cm2, and in option 13, the absorption surface created by leaves was 62.3 cm2, 14 - in the variant, the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 64.8 cm2. The assimilation surface created by the leaves during the pruning period was 430.6 cm2 in our control option, and in the 1st option the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 454.7 cm2, in the 2nd option the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 441.4 cm2, and in the 3rd option the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 441.4 cm2 surface was 454.2 cm2, and in the 4th option the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 453.3 cm2, in the 5th option the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 494.6 cm2, and in the 6th option the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 453.7 cm2, 7- in option 4, the absorptive surface created by leaves was 438.9 cm2, and in option 8, the assimilative surface created by leaves was 451.9 cm2, and in option 9, the assimilative surface created by leaves was 447.7 cm2, and in option 10, the assimilative surface created by leaves was 452 ,3 cm2, and in the 11th option, the absorptive surface created by the leaves was 450.2 cm2, and in the 12th option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 532.3 cm2, and in the 13th option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 461.3 cm2, and in the 14th option it was determined that the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 524.2 cm2. In the flowering phase, the absorptive surface created by the leaves in our control option was 1004.3 cm2, and in the 1st option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 1105.4 cm2, and in the 2nd option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 1086.2 cm2, and in the 3rd option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 1086.2 cm2. surface was 1024.4 cm2, and in the 4th option the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 1103.2 cm2, in the 5th option the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 1209.2 cm2, and in the 6th option the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 1071.7 cm2, 7- in option 1203.6 cm2 of assimilation surface created by leaves, in option 8 the assimilation surface created by leaves was 1265.7 cm2, in option 9 the assimilation surface created by leaves was 1221.4 cm2, and in option 10 the assimilation surface created by leaves was 1230 ,6 cm2, and in the 11th option, the absorptive surface created by the leaves was 1221.2 cm2, and in the 12th option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 1469.6 cm2, and in the 13th option, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 1261.3 cm2, and in the 14th option it was determined that the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 1311.9 cm2. In the ripening phase, the absorptive surface created by the leaves in our control variant was 4534.9 cm2, and in the 1st variant, the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 4689.6 cm2, and in the 2nd variant, the assimilative surface created by the leaves was 4591.5 cm2, and in the 3rd variant, the assimilation surface created by the leaves was 4591.5 cm2 absorption surface was 4761.3 cm2, and in option 4, the absorption surface formed by leaves was 4569.4 cm2, and in option 5, the absorption surface formed by leaves was 4779.2 cm2, and in option 6, the absorption surface formed by leaves was 4687.8 cm2, 7 - in option 4612.6 cm2 of assimilation surface formed by leaves, in option 8 the assimilation surface formed by leaves was 4659.9 cm2, in option 9 the assimilation surface formed by leaves was 4607.7 cm2, and in option 10 the assimilation surface formed by leaves was 4652.4 cm2, and in the 11th option, the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 4645.1 cm2, in the 12th option, the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 5098.7 cm2, and in the 13th option, the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 4780.8 cm2, in the 14th option and it was determined that the assimilation surface formed by the leaves was 4906.2 cm2. |