Copyright 2020 The Author(s). Published by vgtu press

Conclusions
In conclusions, it can be summarized that the collaborative CPS framework developed and ap-
plied to Form 1 students of this study in learning mathematics is effective. This study suggests 
that Form 1 students performed better after the interventions especially in terms of the problem 
solving skills and creativity. The students’ creative problem solving and learning framework 
addressed the crucial basic characteristics of learning and the method employed has achieved 
many of the documented requirements of meaningful learning. This study also implies that 
mathematics is a suitable platform to foster creativity. It proved that solving problems in groups 
is effective in fostering creativity. Discussion among friends encouraged students to think and 
express their thoughts. Hence, students feel that learning mathematics is interesting, and they 
are more confident to solve the problems in more creative ways as many people contribute their 
idea into the group and not only focus on one solution. To conclude, the findings of this study 
has answered all three research questions with favourable responses.
Funding and acknowledgement
This research is supported by grant 2016-0097-106-04 from the National Child Development 
Research Centre in 2017.

---

Creativity Studies, 2020, 13(2): 270–291
287
References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., 
Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (Eds.). (2000). 
A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revi-
sion of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives
. Longman.
Ayob, A., Hussain, A., Marzuki Mustafa, M., & Fauzi Aminuddin Shazi Shaarani, M. (2011). Nurturing 
creativity and innovative thinking through experiential learning. 
Procedia: Social and Behavioral 
Sciences
, 
18
, 247–254. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.035
Brunkalla, K. (2009). How to increase mathematical creativity – An experiment. 
The Mathematics 
Enthusiast
, 
6
(1), 257–266.
Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (2005). Model eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify 
creatively gifted mathematicians. 
The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education
, 
17
(1), 37–47. 
https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-393
Costa, A. L. (Ed.). (2001). 
Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking
. Alexandria: Associa-
tion for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Ellwood, S., Pallier, G., Snyder, A., & Gallette, J. (2009). The incubation effect: Hatching a solution? 
Creativity Research Journal
, 
21
(1), 6–14. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633368
Fard, A. E., Bahador, A., Moghadam, M. N., Rajabi, H., & Moradi, A. N. (2014). The possible impact 
of problem-solving method of instruction on exceptional students’ creativity. 
Journal of Education 
and Training Studies
, 
2
(3), 60–68. 
https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i3.342
Greeno, J. G. (2017). 
Forms of understanding in mathematical problem solving
. Taylor & Francis. 
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315188522-5
Griethuijsen, van R. A. L. F., Eijck, van M. W., Haste, H., Brok, den P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., 
Savran Gencer, A., & BouJaoude, S. (2014). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest 
in science. 
Research in Science Education
, 
45
(4), 581–603. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow.