47
in constructing new systems of social insurance. The social consequences – poor income
security and deficient human services – are consistent with the traditional inference in
microeconomic textbooks that a market economy does not automatically generate
adequate arrangements in these fields. Naturally, I refer to various limitations of markets
for
voluntary income insurance, myopia among some individuals, and difficulties to
borrow for investment in human capital; poverty (and liquidity constraints) is, of course,
another reason why individuals to not acquire voluntary insurance
policies or invest in
human capital.
It is not clear why the Chinese authorities were so late in building up new systems of
income insurance and the provision of human services, when the old systems broke down
in connection with the economic reforms. We may speculate that the overriding concern
for economic growth meant that other
objectives were put aside, possibly since such
objectives were regarded as potentially harming the growth strategy. Alternatively, the
authorities did not realize that markets do not automatically solve problems in the social
field.
However, the shift to a new economic system is not the only background factor for
the need, and demands, to reform the social arrangements in China. Two other
factors
should also be emphasized, namely changes in demography
and the
urbanization process. Behind the recent
demographic
development in China, there
are dramatic changes in both fertility and longevity. Broadly speaking,
the fertility
rate has dropped from about 6.0 immediately after World War II to about 1.5 today,
and life expectancy (at birth) has increased from about 35 years to about 72 years.
96
To begin with, these developments “improved” the age composition of the
population in the sense that the share of individuals of working age (15-59)
increased from about 53 % in 1975 to about 67 % today – a development often
characterized by demographers as a “demographic dividend”. However, as a result
of the
rise in longevity, this dividend is bound to be transformed into a
“demographic deficit” when the number of elderly increases substantially.
97
96
While the US Population Reference Bureau (PRB, 2005) reports today’s fertility rate at 1.6, The
China 2000 County Population Census (All China Marketing Research Co., 2003, reports the figure at
1.3; see, for instance, the discussion in Liu (2006).
97
For instance, the UNPD (2000) predicts that the population share of individuals of working age will
start to fall after 2010, and
return to about 53 % by 2050 – the lowest predicted share at that time among
48
Until a new comprehensive pension system and new arrangements for old-age care
outside the family have been built up (which is bound to take a long time),
relatives will
continue to play the major part in these fields, in particular in rural areas. As a (slight)
caricature of the development, demographers in China talk about the “4-2-1 problem”: a
situation when one child may be required to support and service two aged parents and
four grandparents! The caricature is, of course, only meant to illustrate the likelihood of
either a heavy burden
for individuals of working age, or serious poverty and deficient
services among a large future population of elderly citizens in the country – or, most
likely, a combination of both.
Recent suggestions and tendencies to soften the “one-child policy” are probably
Dostları ilə paylaş: