COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN CHILDHOOD THROUGH
BODY EXPERIENCE
538
(Figure 4) and of the descriptive statistics (Table 6) allows obtaining an initial impression of the interaction
between the “between-subjects” factor and the “within-subjects” one, which
seems to exist among the
participants under investigation. To investigate the effect of interaction on the subjects (Fox, 2008), we refer to
the F-test. There was a statistically significant interaction between didactics and time on L1, F (2, 42) = 25.765,
p
< 0.001, partial
η
2
= 0.551. This value indicates that,
from the initial inspection, we correctly interpreted that
there are different effects of different groups (type of didactics) on the “L1 language” mean over time. In
practice, this means that L1 mean changes differently over time depending on the type of didactics, i.e., if it is
of classic, Montessori or unstructured type. Moreover, L1 mean is lower for the Classic-type didactics group
(-3.87 ± 0.84, p = 0.001) and that of Montessori type (-3.02 ± 0.67, p = 0.001) on a statistically significant level
compared to the unstructured-type didactics (the data are mean ± standard error if not indicated differently).
Figure 4.
L1-Comprehension of Instructions Outcomes.
Table 6
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure: Measure_1
(I) Didactic
(J) Didactic
Mean
Difference
(I-J)
Std.
Error
Sign.
b
95% Confidence Interval for
Difference
b
Lower
Bound
Upper Bound
1
2 -0.864 1.083
1.000
-3.680
1.953
3 -3.886
*
0.841
0.000
-6.073
-1.700
2
1 0.864 1.083
1.000
-1.953
3.680
3 -3.023
*
0.671
0.001
-4.769
-1.276
3
1 3.886
*
0.841
0.000
1.700
6.073
2 3.023
*
0.671
0.001
1.276
4.769
Notes.
Based on estimated marginal means, *. The difference is significant at the 0.05 level; b. Adjustment for multiple
comparisons: Bonferroni.
COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN CHILDHOOD THROUGH BODY EXPERIENCE
539
Dostları ilə paylaş: