384 (2018) 012051 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/384/1/012051
Figure 6 . Results BER Analyzer from uplink configuration.
To see the effect of distance on an FTTH network on BER produced, then the simulation by changing
the distance with range 5 Km - 16 Km. Seen in Table 4. Comparison of BER to FTTH distance. Changes
made is to change the distance of the feeder cable. This is because the maximum distance feeder cable
can reach 20 Km.
Table 4. Comparative results.
No Distance BER 1.
5 Km
3.40433e
-064
2.
6 Km
2.616884e
-059
3.
7 Km
1.87306e
-045
4.
8 Km
9.92868e
-039
5.
9 Km
1.6335e
-036
6.
10 Km
8.43325e
-023
7.
11 Km
3.73269e
-025
8.
12 Km
1.53416e
-019
9.
13 Km
2.86891e
-017
10.
14 Km
7.50784e
-015
11.
15 Km
1.02354e
-015
12.
16 Km
1.30557e
-012
Changes from BER in configuration can be seen clearly. It states that the length of fiber optic cable
used has an influence on performance. The farther the ONU location, the greater the value of BER
obtained and the smaller the received power.
4. Conclusions Based on FTTH device simulation using Optisystem for system performance parameters of BER, Q-
factor, and power link budget resulting from OptiSystem simulation. Obtained overall parameters at
simulation with length L = 17 km, 1490 nm wavelength for downstream and 1310 nm for upstream.
Based on the analysis of FTTH network testing using the PT.Telkom Standard that has been done can
be drawn some conclusions as follows:
