i) Need to improve physical and information infrastructure
Each government needs to provide the framework necessary for the development of the physical
infrastructure and links essential to intermodal transport systems, including access roads to terminals
and seaport channels. For example, landside congestion at ports needs to be reduced through the
development of cost-effective infrastructure to improve access and the application of scheduling
systems based on advanced tracking technologies in order to reduce queuing problems.
At the ports of Los Angeles and Seattle in the United States, on-dock rail facilities are being
provided for American President Lines. This improvement of the physical infrastructure decreases the
number of truck movements required between terminals and nearby intermodal rail terminals, and
eliminates a gate barrier, always a potential cause of delay and cost. In addition, the Port of Seattle has
developed an electronic data information infrastructure, known as “Linx”. The benefits of Linx
include: uniform communications with all trading partners (customers, shippers, carriers, etc.); one-
time data entry; reduction of paperwork; automatic reconciliation; and better market position relative
to non-EDI competitors.
Since competition between port authorities may lead to sub-optimal locations of ports, some
degree of consolidation may be necessary to make intermodal services cost-effective. This may require
the development of a differentiated terminal location policy at the national level (for example, Japan),
or at the international level (for example, at an EU level).
In addition, systems essential to information infrastructure (including global positioning systems
and advanced communication systems to permit the intermodal exchange of information) need to be
further developed in order to maximise the capacity of the entire intermodal transport system.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |