35
and hence excluded from mode 2. Thus, travellers’
expenditure on goods should be separately identified
from their expenditure on services, and only the services
portion of travel expenditure should be allocated to
mode 2. The goods portion would not be allocated to any
mode of supply. In
addition,
supporting and auxiliary
services that are provided to domestic carriers in foreign
ports or to non-resident carriers in domestic ports should
be allocated to mode 2 if they can be separately
identified.
3.44. Mode 3,
commercial presence, is primarily
concerned with FATS and not balance of payments
statistics, and is discussed in detail in chapter IV below.
However, there is one exception to this general rule.
Foreign entities established on a short-term basis to
supply services are considered as non-residents in the
host country in BPM5 and in the present
Manual, and
their transactions with residents
in that country are
recorded in the balance of payments. However, those
entities are considered as
commercial presence under
GATS, which ignores the one-year statistical rule. This
is the case in construction services, such as services
provided by an unincorporated site office carrying out a
short-term construction project. It is therefore
recommended that these
construction services be
allocated to mode 3. The balance of payments
component
construction services also
includes
transactions in services supplied through the presence of
natural persons. Where transactions through the presence
of natural persons form a large part of total
construction
services and they can be separately identified, they
should be allocated to mode 4.
3.45. For the remaining commercial services covered
by GATS––namely,
computer and information services,
other business services, and
personal, cultural and
recreational services––the picture is rather more
complex and might involve significant
elements of both
mode 1 and mode 4. To take a simple example, a
consultant resident in the compiling economy providing
services to a non-resident client may deliver the service
either at the site of the client (mode 4)
or from the office
of the consultant transmitting reports cross border (mode
1)
or a combination of those two. It is recommended
that, to the extent feasible, the location of the supplier at
the time of major service transactions in the above
EBOPS components be determined. This would enable
an allocation of those services between mode 1 and
mode 4. If research were to indicate that for certain
EBOPS components a particular mode of supply
provides only a small proportion of the total supply, then
all of that type of service might be allocated to the
dominant mode.
3.46. The simplifying assumptions
for the allocation of
trade by mode of supply set out in paragraphs 3.40 to
3.44 above should be regarded as a guide to first steps in
the estimation process and be subjected to periodic
review and empirical testing of their validity and
appropriateness.
3.47. Compensation of non-resident employees is
included in income in the balance of payments and is
therefore not included in EBOPS. It may, however, yield
indicators of mode 4 (
presence of natural persons)
activity. The present
Manual therefore recommends that
a breakdown of compensation of non-resident
employees by the industry of the employing
establishment
be identified, to the extent possible, from
existing data sources.
3.48. Services purchased in host economies by
individuals and government units that are based in
diplomatic and other similar enclaves in the host
economy are included in
government services, n.i.e.,
which is a residual category for government transactions
that are not classified to other components of EBOPS.
Those services transactions are covered by GATS (mode
2) when provided by non-government entities. However,
this
Manual does not recommend that the purchases of
those services (that is, those supplied by non-
government entities) be separately identified from
purchases of services supplied
by government entities or
from purchases of goods.
44
Dostları ilə paylaş: