EL.LE, 3, 3, 2014, pp. 505-522 510 Bier. The Motivation of Second/Foreign Language Teachers ISSN 2280-6792 what teachers believe and think. Burns defines it in terms of «theories
for practice» (Burns 1996, emphasis added), specifically those cognitive
structures that teachers adopt for planning, decision making, and behav-
ing in the language classroom. According to Kennedy, this type of teacher
knowledge has been indelibly imprinted by the teachers’ «own experiences
as students» (Kennedy 1990, in Bailey et al. 1996, p. 11), by their «ap-
prenticeship of observation» (Lortie 1975, in Bailey et al. 1996). Goodlad
concludes that the result of the teachers’ experiences as students first and
teacher trainees afterwards is that they generally «teach as [they] have
been taught» (Goodlad 1983, in Knezevic, Scholl 1996, p. 81). The conse-
quence is that the role of teacher ‘models’ is crucial because during their
«apprenticeship of observation» trainee teachers internalize examples of
good and bad behaviour (Bailey et al. 1996) to adopt and avoid, respec-
tively, in their future career as teachers. Thus, the teachers’ experience,
positive or negative, of their own language learning at school first and
university later influences their cognition (Barnard, Burns 2012).
’Explicit’ and ‘implicit’ knowledge interact with each other and as «teach-
ers select and modify theoretical ideas in ways that are consistent with
their personal beliefs about teaching and learning and their practical
knowledge of the ESL context» (Binnie Smith 1996, p. 214), this interac-
tion impacts on classroom practice (Gutierrez Almarza 1996). It is through
the interplay between their «theories for practice» and «theories of prac-
tice» (Burns 1996) that teachers come to understand their conceptions of
themselves as teachers, their vision, and their limits (Johnson 1996).
3.2 Teacher Affect
The most relevant theoretical contributions on the role of emotions in SLA
were those by Magda B. Arnold, Jane Arnold and Schumann, who adopted
M.B. Arnold’s theory in language teaching. Both M.B. Arnold’s Cognitive
Theory of Emotions (M.B. Arnold 1960, and J. Arnold 1999, in Balboni
2013), and Schumann’s Input Appraisal Theory (Schumann 1998, 2004, in
Daloiso 2009, and in Balboni 2013) agree on the fact that each emotional stimulus from the outside is evaluated by the human brain following a
series of criteria, in order to facilitate (or hinder) the repetition of the ex-
perience. These theories were primarily referred to language learners but
they make sense for teachers as well in that for both, teacher and students,
emotions play a crucial role, being parent elements of conscious feelings
and motivational drives.
Several studies in the recent past explored emotions in teaching practice
in many different contexts. Cowie analyzed the emotional dimension of
teaching among university EFL professors in Japan (Cowie 2011). Martin