Science and Education in Karakalpakstan. 2023 №2/1 ISSN 2181-9203 322
effectiveness of departmental law-creativeness, in our opinion, is the implementation of the purpose
of the law, in the development of which the departmental legal acts are adopted, the achievement of
the completeness of the regulation of the relevant area of relations.
Foreign practice shows that any ministry, as a rule, coordinates the draft of its NLA with
interested departments and, above all, with the Ministry of Justice. In Japan, the ministry draws up
the first draft of a legal act prepared to achieve the goal set in the performance of its administrative
duties, consults on it with other interested ministries [20].
Thus, we can point out the following requirements for the modern model of departmental
law-creativeness: a) its basis should be a comprehensive identification of the needs for departmental
legal regulation; b) it is necessary to make a reasonable decision on the means, forms and methods
of legal regulation; c) development of the concept of a departmental normative legal act, taking into
account the scope and boundaries of its operation, ensuring harmonious relationships with the
legislative level of regulation; d) taking into account in the law-creativeness process all the
requirements and achievements of jurisprudence, as well as coordinating the project with other
interested parties.
5. Conclusion. Departmental law-creativeness is an important link in the mechanism of legal regulation, a
special element of law-creativeness, an essential part of the legal activities of ministries and other
executive authorities. Being an integral element of the mechanism of legal regulation, it manifests
itself as a professional and competent system for the development of departmental legal acts that
ensure the specification and implementation of laws, as well as the completeness of legal regulation.
Departmental law-creativeness is of an objective nature, it is in demand by practice, without
it the effectiveness of the mechanism of legal regulation decreases, it has a subordinate nature,
limited by the competence and scope of the department, strict regulation, use strictly when it is
objectively necessary.
The necessity of developing a list of criteria that determine the limits of the object and
subject of departmental legal acts is substantiated, and the scope of departmental law-creativeness is
clarified.
The foregoing allows us to conclude that today there is an objective need for legislative
consolidation of the mechanism for delimiting the subject and limits of regulation of departmental
normative legal acts, and, accordingly, departmental law-creativeness. Thus, the development of an
updated model of departmental law-creativeness will ensure its legality, improve quality and
efficiency.