Some people think that parents should teach their children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the best place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in 
newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

---

It is being argued that media houses should not disclose the personal lives 
of statesmen. I completely agree with this statement because it will not 
only violate their right to privacy, but also they should focus their 
resources on more pressing issues that need immediate attention such as 
poverty. 
It is the fundamental right of every human being to have their privacy. 
Even though they are public figures, their private lives should be away 
from the eyes of the media. They should only be judged against the 
service towards their countries and not for what is happening in their day-
to-day affairs. The prime example of this can be seen in the Constitution of 
the USA, which gives its citizens the right to privacy. 
In addition to this, it is the responsibility of newspapers to address 
important matters including poverty. Media can be a very powerful 
medium, so rather than talking about 
other people’s life, resources should 
be diverted towards putting pressure on public officials to engage them in 
solving real-life problems. Using their influence to the benefit of the 
general public should be the main focus of newspapers. For example, 
during the Great Depression, The Guardian was the main voice of people 
in protesting against the poor living conditions.
In conclusion, I do not support the argument of newspapers publishing the 
personal information of government officials. This is because it will result 
in the violation of their privacy and also the primary focus of news 
agencies should be to highlight key issues concerning the nation. 
 
Some people say that television is useful for education, while others