Categories of Cutting length ,cm .
T
h
e
c
u
tt
in
g
le
n
g
th
p
e
rc
e
n
ta
g
e
,%
.
drum speed=13.1 m/s
drum speed=15.71 m/s
drum speed=18.33 m/s
The reason may be due to rice straw has strong fiber contains silicon can
not be cut easily and elongated before cutting. While the cotton stalks cut
was the shorter than crop. residues because the cotton stalks has a solid
cross-section and that wanes the chopping easier. on the other hand the
difference in cut length for different crop residues was due to the
difference in physical and mechanical properties of plant stalks
2-feed rate .
Fig.(3): the relation between the cutting length percentage % and
categories of cutting length at different feeding rate for different crop
residues.
The obtained results indicated that increasing feed rate from 0.5 ton/h to
1.5 ton/h, decreased the percentage of cut length of <3.5 cm (first
category) from 78.5 to 70.2 % of rice straw, from 80.2 to 75.2 % of corn
stalks and from 70.4 to 66.7 %of cotton stalks respectively. While the
second and third categories (3.5 -10 cm and <10 cm) was increased from
16.2 to 20.7 % and 5.3 to 9.1%of rice straw, from 15.3 to 18.3 and 4.5 to
6.5% of corn stalks and from 19.0 to 21.1 % and 10.6 to 12.2 % of cotton
stalks respectively at 4 cm
2
oval slots
concave, 18.3m/s drum speed,14.3 % moisture content and 3 cm drum-
concave clearance.
Fig.(3): the relation between the cutting length percentage % and categories of
cutting length at different feeding rate for different crop residues.
Misr J. Ag. Eng., July 2007
514
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
< 3.5 cm
3.5-10
cm
> 10 cm < 3.5 cm
3.5-10
cm
> 10 cm < 3.5 cm
3.5-10
cm
> 10 cm
Rice straw
Corn stalks
cotton stalks
10> Dostları ilə paylaş: |