Forty-Four
cbe plADecARy
bieRARCby
t the beginning of the previous chapter we mentioned that there are different interpretations of the seven. These differences also have to do with part of the disagreement over the order of the planets as given in various texts.
This inconsistency, when not a question of distortions, proceeds either from the designation of different terms and symbols for the same things, or from an actual difference of the methods followed. When we speak of the seven "centers of life” we must also bear in mind that present in each are the forces of the others alongside its own, which is the dominant one.
438 Thus, by way of a given method or of a temperament more akin to one of the secondary energies than to the dominant one, there can be produced in a given center the awakening of a principle that normally should correspond to another center? so chat one planet in the symbolism may take the place ol another. So, for example, that same tiny
luz to which we have alluded (see page 172, note 15), from which "the body sprouts or recreates itself in resurrection” according to the qabalistic tradition Agrippa refers to (and in full accord with the analogous Hindu teaching), is situated in the mystic region of the sacrum—but in certain Teraphim figures is found between the two eyes and also in the heart.
So one and the same force, or state, is manifested in different centers.
Della Riviera gives the following order: Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Earth, Venus,
Moon, and Sun
439 440 The interpretation is double and depends on whether it is a question of the dry path, that is, of a
continuous line of purification and transformation up to the light form (Moon) and then to the Sun—or a question of phases
succeeding to a preliminary realization of the Sun, in the sense of the grades of resurrection that the Sun itself works through when it goes to work on Saturn, the Body (or Earth), In
this instance Saturn generates, as die myth says, the different gods (corresponding to the planets) and rises finally to the absolute perfection of the Sun or Gold, wherein, by "the removal of all their infirmities, impurities and heterogeneous ingredients," the "magic metals"
441 442 443 are transformed.
Pernety provides this order: Lead (Saturn, black), Tin (Jupiter, gray), Silver (Moon, white), Copper (Venus, reddish-yellow), Iron (Mars, rust), Purple, and Gold (Sun, red).'
1 Here it is clear that the planers and the metals correspond to the phases of the diminishing of the darkness (from black to gray to silver) and of progressive ignification (orange, rust, red).
In Philalethes, the Lordship of Mercury rakes first place as the "Labor of Hercules," of "separation" whereby the Gold ”is stripped
of its gilded garments," "the breaking of the Lion by such a struggle that he is reduced to the greatest debility." The rulership of Saturn follows, the black color, and here "the Lion is dead." Jupiter comes next, die God that dethroned Saturn, who now approaches but the first traces of the
albedo- The immaculate white is the domain of the Moon. Venus follows—going from the white to the green—expressing the first symbolic plant growth from the Earth-body’s cohesion, which rises up as freed of the impure hear of the dead Lion. The
green rhen becomes sky blue, turning livid and changing to reddish brown, then pale purple, colors that indicate the iosis or combustion that begins to be produced within the heart of $ But now Mars intervenes, virile and ironlike, to produce the desiccation: "Here the Matter is enclosed and .sealed in die bowels of her son and purified until having cast out of the composition all impurity and having replaced it with eternal purity": it is the color orange (which in Fernery corresponds to rust). Finally the Lordship of the Sun is reached, in which "from thy Materia a light hardly to be imagined will irradiate," which after three days becomes the most intense red.
1