221
and discussion thus overcoming the notion that constructivism is purely learning
through hand-on experiences only. This became obvious as the PDP progressed, with
the teachers partaking in the PDP divided over time,
by the researcher, into three
groups:
i)
those requiring maximum support in the form of modelling and
continuing to require support in the form of modelling sections of
lessons at stage 2 of the PDP
ii)
those teachers who required decreasing support following the first
modelled lesson and continued to teach at stage 2 with
minimal
support generally in the form of pre lesson explanations
iii)
those teachers who required minimal support and once they had the
resources and explanations at stage 1 proceeded to teach themselves at
stage 1 and continued to do so through stage 2,
with support in the
form of affirmation and feedback on their teaching.
Professional development to date, in Ireland, had focussed on explanations and
resources given to teachers at workshops (such as those
provided through summer
courses facilitated by Teacher Education Centres or the INTO), with little support once
the workshop concluded. The majority of teachers in the school were in groups i) or ii)
requiring much more than what was being provided. This mis-match between teacher
need and resource provision by the Department of Education and Skills resulted in not
one single teacher having taught a lesson with only the resources provided. All of the
teachers required the support of the facilitator to some extent.
This is akin to a stages of
change model, whereby change for teachers is not ‘a one shot knowledge transfer
model’ (Conway, 2009), but depends on teachers’ skills, abilities and interest at any one
Dostları ilə paylaş: