REFERENCES
ABRANTES, P. (1993). Project work in school mathematics. In J. De Lande, I. Huntley, C. Keitel, & M.
Niss (Eds.),
Innovation in maths education by modelling and applications
(pp. 355-364). London:
Ellis Horwood.
ANDERSON, J.R., REDER, L.M.., & SIMON, H.A. (1996).
Applications and misapplications of cognitive
psychology to mathematics education.
Available: http://psy.cmu.edu/~mm4b/misapplied.html.
BLUM, W. (1991). Applications and modelling in mathematics teaching - A review of arguments and
instructional aspects. In M. Niss, W. Blum, & I. Huntley (Eds.),
Teaching of mathematical modelling
and applications
(pp. 10-29). England: Ellis Horwood.
BOARD OF STUDIES NSW. (1996).
Mathematics Standard Course: Years 9-10.
Sydney: BOS.
16
BRUNER, S. (1960).
The process of education.
Cambridge: Harward University Press.
CLEMENTS, M.A. (1987). Personally speaking.
Vinculum,
24(1), pp. 3-5.
DE LANGE, J. (1993). Innovations in mathematics education using applications: Progress and problems.
In J. De Lange, I. Huntley, C. Keitel, M. Niss (Eds.),
Innovation in maths education by modelling and
applications
(pp. 3-18). London: Ellis Horwood.
DEWEY, J. (1938).
Experience and education.
New York: Kappa Delta Pi.
FREEMAN, C., & SOKOLOFF, H.J. (1995). Children learn to make a better world: Exploring themes.
Childhood Education
, 73, pp. 17-22.
FREEMAN, C., & SOKOLOFF, H.J. (1996). Toward a theory of theory of thematic curricula:
Constructing new learning environments for teachers & learners.
Education Policy Analysis Archives
,
3(14), pp. 1-19.
FREUDENTHAL, H. (1991).
Revisiting mathematics education.
Dordrecht: Kluwer A.P.
GALBRAITH, P., BLUM, W., & HUNTLEY, I.D. (1998).
Mathematical modelling: Teaching and
assessment in a technology-rich world
. Chicester: Horwood Pub. Co.
GOOD, T.L., & BROPHY, J.E. (1994).
Looking in classrooms
. Harper Collins College Publishers.
HANDAL, B. (2000). Teaching in themes: is that easy?
Reflections,
25(3), pp. 48-49.
HANDAL, B., BOBIS, J.& GRIMISON, L. (2001). Teachers' Mathematical beliefs and practices in
teaching and learning thematically. In J. Bobis, B. Perry & M.Mitchelmore (Eds.),
Numeracy and
Beyond.
Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education
Research Group of Australasia Inc (pp. 265-272), Sydney: MERGA.
HENDERSON, R. W., & LANDESMAN, E.M. (1995). Effects of thematically integrated mathematics
instruction on students of Mexican descent.
Journal of Educational Research
, 88(5), pp. 290-300.
HUNTER, L. (1996). The essential changes to the new 9-10 syllabus.
Reflections,
22(1), pp. 48-53.
MURPHY, E. (1997).
Characteristics of constructivist learning and teaching.
Universite Laval, Quebec.
Available: http://www.stemnet.nf.ca/~elmurphy/emurphy/cle3.html.
PERFETTI, C.A., & GOLDMAN, S.R. (1975). Discourse functions of thematization and topicalization.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
, 4(3), pp. 257-271.
17
18
SCHROEDER, T.L., & LESTER, F.K. (1989). Developing understanding in mathematics via problem
solving. In P.R. Trafton (Ed.),
New directions for elementary school mathematics
(pp. 31-56). Reston:
NCTM.
SEELY, A. (1995).
Integrated thematic units
. Westminter, CA: Teachers Created Materials.
WHITE, A. & HASTINGS, J. (2000). Mathematical modelling: Traditional applications, open
investigations or a foot in each camp.
Reflections,
25(1), pp. 22-23.
Document Outline - INTRODUCTION
- THE JUNIOR SECONDARY STANDARD MATHEMATICS COURSE
- TEACHING STYLES IN THEMATIC MATHEMATICS
- METHODOLOGY
- Questionnaire Component of the Study
- Interview Component of the Study
- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
- Quantitative Results
- Qualitative Results
- CONCLUSION
- REFERENCES
Dostları ilə paylaş: |