The status and distribution in singapore of pomatocalpa diffusum



Yüklə 43.65 Kb.
PDF просмотр
tarix19.08.2017
ölçüsü43.65 Kb.

 

147


NATURE IN SINGAPORE 2010 3: 147–152 

Date of Publication: 8 August 2010 

© National University of Singapore 

 

 



THE STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION IN SINGAPORE OF 

POMATOCALPA DIFFUSUM BREDA 

 

Alvin Francis S. L. Lok, W. F. Ang and Hugh T. W. Tan





Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore 

14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore 

(

*

Corresponding author: 

dbsttw@nus.edu.sg

 

 



INTRODUCTION 

 

This paper documents the distribution and status of Pomatocalpa diffusum Breda (Fig. 1) in Singapore. Pomatocalpa is 



a rather small, mainly epiphytic, vandaceous orchid genus, previously thought to comprise of around 35–40 species 

(Comber, 1990; Seidenfaden & Wood, 1992), but has recently been revised and determined to comprise of only 13 

species and six subspecies (Watthana, 2007). 

 

The genus is rather widely distributed and can be found from India to Malesia, eastwards through New Guinea, the 



Cape York Peninsula of Australia, and Fiji, northwards to northeastern Himalaya, and Taiwan (Comber, 1990; 

Seidenfaden & Wood, 1992; Watthana, 2007). The highest number of congeners are found in Thailand (six species) and 

Peninsular Malaysia-Singapore (six species), followed by Borneo (five species), and Sumatra (five species), while 

China, Taiwan, Bangladesh, the lesser Sunda Islands, Vanuatu, and Fiji only have one species each, indicating that the 

centre of diversity of Pomatocalpa lies within the boundaries of Thailand, and Peninsular Malaysia-Singapore 

(Watthana, 2007). 

 

Pomatocalpa is derived from the Greek pomataos meaning flask or cup and calpe meaning pitcher, which refers to the 

flask- or cup-shaped labellum (lip). The genus was established by Jacob Gijsbertus Samuël van Breda in 1829, who first 

described a single species (Pomatocalpa spicatum) based on a specimen collected by Kuhl, and van Hassel from Java 

(Breda, 1829; Watthana, 2007). However, the holotype designated by Breda at Leiden was lost, thus leading Pearce and 

Cribb (2002) to designate the illustration rendered by Breda (Breda, 1829: pl. 15) as the lectotype. The second species 

Pomatocalpa diffusum was described by Breda (1830) in Genera et Species OrchidearumFascicle IV, which was for 

many years thought to have existed as a single copy and thus was not accepted as being effectively published until van 

Steenis-Kruseman & Veldkamp (1991) discovered a second copy of the book and reinstated the taxon. 

 

The genus was initially disregarded and overlooked (Seindenfaden, 1988) until Smith (1912) reinstated the genus, 



finding however that many taxa were wrongly allocated to other genera, such as Cleisostoma, and Saccolabium 

amongst many others. Smith later supplied a preliminary list of 29 taxa, which he admitted, was crude owing to 

insufficient descriptions. On top of this, the genus Pomatocalpa was for many years erroneously placed in the subtribe 

Sarcanthinae Benth., as first noted by Rasmussen (1985), because the subtribe was based on an illegitimate name, 

Sarcanthus Lindl. Seindenfaden (1988) later proposed that Pomatocalpa be placed in the subtribe Aeridinae Pfitzer, 

which has since been universally accepted (Watthana, 2007). 

 

Pomatocalpa species are typically monopodial, with the stem apex growing continuously and producing distichously 

alternating leaves while the base of the stem gradually dies away. The inflorescences are axillary and the aerial roots 

penetrate the leaf sheaths (Watthana, 2007). Congeners can be broadly classified into two main groups. The first group 

consists of small- to medium-sized, fan-shaped plants with 2–11 leaves and short internodes, while the second group 

consists mainly of large, rambling plants with more than 10 leaves and long internodes. In the second group, the roots 

are produced all along the length of the stem, to secure the plant firmly to its substrate. Pomatocalpa diffusum is 

belongs to the second group. 

 

Pomatocalpa species are generally found in evergreen rain forest, but have also been reported in other tropical habitats 

such as mangrove forest, scrub, rocky sea shores, as well as isolated trees in open sites, and cultivated areas. Most 

species are lowland plants up to an altitude of 750 m with only a few species being recorded above 1,000 m. The 

flowers are probably bee-pollinated, as van der Pijl and Dodson (1966), and Jones (1981) have observed bees (Trigona 

sp.) with dark pollinaria of Pomatocalpa macphersonii attached to their heads. Congeners also seem to have a 

phorophyte preference for Myristica and Syzygium species (Mursidawati et al., 1999) and were observed to generally 

grow on the lower main tree trunk instead of the high branches of the crown which is preferred by other genera 

(Watthana, 2007). 


Lok et al.: The status of Pomatocalpa diffusum in Singapore 

 

148



 

Fig. 1. Pomatocalpa diffusum growing midway on the main trunk and low branches of a Cratoxylum formosum tree just outside the 

SAF Nee Soon Range I. Scale bar = 10 cm. (Photograph by: Alvin Francis Lok Siew Loon). 

 

 



PAST AND PRESENT RECORDS 

 

Pomatocalpa diffusum was previously known by synonyms such as Cleisostoma cumingii Rchb. f., Cleisostoma 



latifolium Lindl., Pomatocalpa latifolium (Lindl.) J. J. Sm., Saccolabium hortense Ridl., Saccolabium latifolium (Lindl.) 

Schltr., and Sarcanthus cumingii (Rchb. f.) J. J. Sm. (Watthana, 2007). Pomatocalpa diffusum plants are mainly 

rambling although compact plants are encountered from time to time (Figs. 1, 2). Their stems have been known to reach 

5 m long, with a stem diameter of 1–1.3 cm and internodes of up to 4.6 cm long. The leaves are scattered evenly along 

the stem, with tubular leaf sheaths tightly embracing the stem for their entire length. The leaf blade is 15–23 cm ×

 1.7–


2.3 cm, narrowly oblong to linear. The inflorescences are 7–30 cm long, paniculate with up to five branches and bearing 

as many as 200 flowers (Fig. 2). Each branch is 2.4–5.8 cm long, bearing 15–50 flowers, with basal branches sometimes 

producing second-order branches. The peduncle is 4–23 cm long with brownish-purple spots. The terminal rachis is 2–

6.4 cm long, and the side branch rachides 0.2–4.3 cm long and usually ridged. The non-resupinate flowers are dirty-

yellow with reddish-brown borders on the sepals and petals and are about 1.2 cm in diameter (Fig. 3). The dorsal sepal 

is 3.0–4.2 × 0.9–1.6 mm, obovate-oblong, obtuse and three-veined. The laterals are 2.3–3.8 × 1.2–1.8 mm, obovate to 

obovate-oblong, slightly oblique, acute to obtuse and three-veined. The petals are 2.1–3.9 × 0.7–1.5 mm, obovate-

oblong and sometimes falcate, obtuse and three-veined. The labellum is complex with the mid-lobe producing a less 

than 90° abaxial angle to the spur, which is broadly-ovate, acute sometimes obtuse and strongly recurved. The 

labellum’s side lobes are obliquely triangular, subacute to acute. The spur is 2.4–3.5 mm long and 1.3–1.7 mm in 

diameter, bucket-shaped, dorsoventrally compressed, and slightly inflated. 

 

Pomatocalpa diffusum is quite widely distributed, ranging from Thailand, Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore, Borneo, 

Sumatra, Java, Bali, Sulawesi (Watthana, 2007), and possibly the Philippines (Comber, 2001). This species usually 

grows as an epiphyte on tree trunks and low branches in shaded as well as open areas in lowland tropical rain forest, 

mangrove forest, dipterocarp forest, beach forest and solitary trees in villages up to an altitude of 300 m (Watthana,


NATURE IN SINGAPORE 2010 

 

149



 

Fig. 2. Cultivated Pomatocalpa diffusum specimen flowering. Scale bar = 5 cm. (Photograph by: Alvin Francis Lok Siew Loon).

 

 

 



 

Fig. 3. Close-up of Pomatocalpa diffusum flowers showing non-resupination. Scale bar = 0.5 cm. (Photograph by: Alvin Francis Lok 

Siew Loon). 


Lok et al.: The status of Pomatocalpa diffusum in Singapore 

 

150



Table 1. Pomatocalpa diffusum Breda specimen details in the Herbarium, Singapore Botanic Gardens (SING). 

S/No. 

Bar Code No. 

Collector 

Collector's No. 

Date Collected 

Locality 

1. 


0041040 

J. S. Goodenough 

s.n. 28 

Aug.1889 

Jurong 

 

 



 

Fig. 4. Pomatocalpa diffusum growing with other orchidaceous epiphytes and Platycerium coronarium on the trunk and branches of a 



Cratoxylum formosum tree. (Photograph by: Alvin Francis Lok Siew Loon). 

NATURE IN SINGAPORE 2010 

 

151



 

 

 



 

 

 



2007), but also as a lithophyte on granitic bed rock (Comber, 2001; Watthana, 2007), or terrestrially in grassland and 

scrub (Comber, 2001). Other phorophytes include cultivated Lagerstroemia,  Garcinia and Tamarindus species trees 

(Watthana, 2007). 

 

In Singapore this species is nationally critically endangered (Tan et. al., 2008; Chong et. al., 2009) and was last 



collected on 28 Aug.1889 at Jurong (Table 1). Today, this species is only found in the Nee Soon Swamp Forest where 

sterile specimens were first observed in Feb.2010 growing on a Cratoxylum formosum tree outside the SAF Nee Soon 

Range I (Fig. 4), with other native orchid species including the nationally critically endangered Bulbophyllum sessile 

(Fig. 5), nationally endangered Bulbophyllum vaginatum (Fig. 6), and Polystachya concreta which was previously 

thought to be nationally extinct. In mid-Apr.2010, specimens collected from the host phorophytes in Feb.2010 started 

developing inflorescences and flowered in cultivation in May 2010 (Fig. 2), which also coincided with the flowering of 

wild specimens on the host phorophyte in-situ (Figs. 1, 6). This may have indicated that the flowering of the plants in 

cultivation were natural and not caused by stress. 

 

Interestingly, only a single Cratoxylum formosum phorophyte seemed to be festooned with a wealth of epiphytes, while 



surrounding trees were devoid of epiphytic orchids and ferns, indicating the distinct preference for certain phorophytes, 

especially for the orchids. Possible explanations could include physical factors such as the highly scaly and fissured 

bark of Cratoxylum formosum which probably helps retain water in an increasingly desiccating Singapore environment 

and also provide a better foothold for orchid roots to penetrate. Other biotic reasons for phorophyte preference might 

also include symbiotic relationships with Crematogaster ant species which are found under the bark of the entire tree as 

well as around the root systems of the orchids and within the shield fronds of the Platycerium coronarium growing on 

the same tree. Crematogaster ant infestation may help play a part in plant herbivory protection as well as from 

mechanical damage from Macaca fasicularis (long-tailed macaques), which are usually found foraging on all other 

surrounding trees, but hardly ever on this specific Cratoxylum formosum individual. The last possible reason is that the 

fissured bark of this Cratoxylum formosum may be extensively infected with orchid mycorrhizae and combined with the 

moisture-retaining characteristics of the bark; create a more ideal habitat for orchid seed germination. 

 

Fig. 6. Pomatocalpa diffusum growing and flowering in-situ with 



Bulbophyllum vaginatum. Scale bar = 5 cm. (Photograph by: 

Alvin Francis Lok Siew Loon). 

Fig. 5. The critically endangered Bulbophyllum sessile growing 

on the same tree as Pomatocalpa diffusum. Scale bar = 1 cm. 

(Photograph by: Alvin Francis Lok Siew Loon). 


Lok et al.: The status of Pomatocalpa diffusum in Singapore 

 

152



ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

 

We would like to express our gratitude to the Chief Executive Officer and staff members of the National Parks Board 



(NParks) for allowing us access to collections of Pomatocalpa diffusum at the Herbarium, Singapore Botanic Gardens 

(SING), as well as for granting us permission to survey the Central Catchment Nature Reserve. 

 

 

LITERATURE CITED 



 

Breda, J. G. S. van, 1829. Genera et Species Orchidearum et Asclepiadearum Quas in Itinere per Insulam Java, etc. 



Fascicle III. Gandavi (Gent). 53 pp. 

Chong, K. Y., H. T. W. Tan & R. T. Corlett, 2009. A Checklist of the Total Vascular Plant Flora of Singapore: Native, 



Naturalised and Cultivated Species. Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, National University of Singapore, 

Singapore. 273 pp. Uploaded 12 Nov.2009. 

http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/raffles_museum_pub/flora_of_singapore_tc.pdf

(Accessed 8 May 2010). 



Comber, J. B., 1990. Orchids of Java. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, England. 407 pp. 

Comber, J. B., 2001. Orchids of Sumatra. Natural History Publication, Borneo. 1,026 pp. 

Pearce, N. R. & P. J. Cribb, 2002. The Orchids of Bhutan. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. 643 

pp. 


Jones, D. L., 1981. The pollination of selected Australian Orchids. In: Lawler, L. & R. D. Kerr (eds.) Proceedings of the 

Orchid Symposium Held as a Satellite Function of the 13

th

 International Botanical Congress. Sydney, Australia, 

1981. Orchid Society of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Pp. 40–43. 

Murisidawati, S., Norton, D. A. & I. P. Astuti, 1999. Distribution of Pomatocalpa spicatum Breda (Orchidaceae) within 

and among host trees in Manusela National Park, Seram, Maluku Archipelago, Indonesia. Selbyana20(1): 116–119. 

Rasmussen, F. N., 1985. Orchids. In: Dahlgren, R. M. T., H. T. Clifford & P. F. Yeo (eds.) The Families of the 



Monocotyledons―Structure, Evolution and Taxonomy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Pp. 323–349. 

Seidenfaden, G., 1988. Orchid Genera in Thailand XIV. Fifty-nine vandoid Genera. Opera Botanica 95: 1–398. 

Seidenfaden, G. & J. J. Wood, 1992. The Orchids of Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg. 

779 pp. 


Smith, J. J., 1912. Sarcanthus Lindl. Und die Nachstverwandten GattungenNatuurw. Tijdschr. Ned-Indië 72: 79–115. 

Tan, H. T. W., K.-x. Tan, Ali bin Ibrahim, P. T. Chew, K. S. Chua, H. Duistermaat, S. K. Ganesan, M. W. K. Goh, A. 

T.  Gwee,  R.  Kiew,  S.  M.  L.  Lee,  P.  Leong,  J.  Lim,  A.  F.  S.  L.  Lok,  A.  H.  B.  Loo,  S.  K.  Y.  Lum,  T.  Morgany, 

Saifuddin bin Suran, S. Sim, Haji Samsuri bin Haji Ahmad, Y. C. Wee, K. F. Yap, C. K. Yeo & J. W. H. Yong, 

2008. Checklists of threatened species: Seed plants. In: Davison, G. W. H., P. K. L. Ng & H. C. Ho (eds.), The 

Singapore Red Data Book: Threatened Plants and Animals of Singapore. 2

nd

 Edition. Nature Society (Singapore), 

Singapore. Pp. 213–245. 

van der Pijl, L. & C. H. Dodson, 1966. Orchid flowers. Their Pollination and Evolution. Fairchild Tropical Garden and 

University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida, USA. 214 pp.  

van Steeenis-Kruseman, M. J. & J. F. Veldkamp, 1991. Van Breda’s Genera et Species Orchidarium Fasc. IIII 

effectively published. Flora Malesia Bulletin11: 331–334. 



Watthana, S., 2007. The genus Pomatocalpa (Orchidaceae): A taxonomic monograph. Harvard Papers in Botany

11(2): 207–256. 


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə