Theme: observation for developmental purposes and classroom research contents: introduction

References

1. 
   Almutairi, T. S. SH. S. A. (2016). Teacher Evaluation in Kuwait - Evaluation of the Current System and Consideration of Risk-Based Analysis as a Principle for Further Development, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online:http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11857/
   
2. 
   Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   
3. 
   Carreiro, J., Guffey, J.S., & Rampp, L. C. (1999). A Paradigm for the Training of Part-Time Teachers in Community Colleges. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED436194
   
4. 
   Chapman, O. (2007). Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge and Inquiry Teaching Approaches. In Woo, J. H., Lew, H. C., Park, K. S. & Seo, D. Y. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2, pp. 97-104. Seoul: PME.
   
5. 
   Duffy, F. M. (1997). Supervising schooling, not teachers. Educational Leadership, 54, ( 8), 7883.
   
6. 
   Freeman, D. (1982). Observing Teachers: Three Approaches to In-Service Training and Development. TESOL Quarterly, 16(1), 21-28. doi:10.2307/3586560
   
7. 
   Glickman, C. D., & Tamashiro, R. T. (1980). Clarifying teachers’ beliefs about discipline. Educational Leadership, 37(6), 459-464.
   
8. 
   Glickman, C. D. (1990). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Allan and Bacon.
   
9. 
   Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R. & Krajewski, J. (1980). Clinical Supervision: Special Methods for the Supervision of Teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   
10. 
    Goldsberry, L. (1988). Three functional methods of supervision. Action in teacher education, 10(1), 1-10.
    
11. 
    Gordove, E. (2002) Educational Management. Christ the King College. Calbayog City,
    
    1. 
       Philippines.
       
12. 
    Klinger, D. A., Shulha, L. M., & DeLuca, C. (2008). Teacher evaluation, accountability, and professional learning: The Canadian perspective. Pensamiento educativo, 43(2), 209-222.
    

13. 
    Marshall, K. (2009). Rethinking Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: How to Work Smart, Build Collaboration, and Close the Achievement Gap. Second Edition.
    
14. 
    Mulyasa, E. (2007). Kepala sekolah profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Bali, Indonesia.
    
15. 
    OECD (2013), Teachers for the 21st Century: Using Evaluation to Improve Teaching, OECD publishing.
    
16. 
    Olivia, P. F., & Pawlas, G. E. (1997). Supervision for Today‘s Schools, 5th ed New York, NY.: Longman.
    
17. 
    Pennington, M., & Young, A. (1989). Approaches to Faculty Evaluation for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 619-646. doi:10.2307/3587535
    
18. 
    Zuzovsky, R. (2009). Teachers’ qualifications and their impact on student achievement: Findings from TIMSS 2003 data for Israel. IERI Monograph Series. Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments, 2, 37-62.
    
19. 
    Tennant, A. (2006). Key issues in classroom observation. IATEFL VOICES, 191, (8).
    
20. 
    Wilcox, B. (2000). Making School Inspection Visits More Effective: The English Experience. Paris: UNESCO
    
21. 
    Wragg, E.C. (1999). An Introduction to Classroom Observation and Class Management in Primary Schools. Published in April 2001 by Roultledgefalmer.
    

1^ Imageby Andrew Seamanon Unsplash