Variation of score in language achievement tests according to gender, item format and skill areas

Conclusion
The phenomenon of syntagma and relative syntagmas in Azerbaijani and English languages was investigated, learned, and developed for the first time. Also, syntactic, semantic, and stylistic features of syntagma as a unit of syntax were classified according to their types. Their meanings were widely spoken of, and their importance was highlighted comprehensively. However, this unit which consists of two members of the combined words was used in the functions of determining and being determined.
The consideration of the internal structure of the language allows the making of a general methodological conclusion in forming a full-fledged linguistic representations of the signs of language. Also, the successful assimilation of studying the native language of the entire system must be the assimilation of knowledge as a paradigmatic and syntagmatic language system. So, syntagmatics and paradigmatics function at all units of language and at all levels. Hence, they are regarded as paradigmatics morphology and syntagmatics syntax. This fact is explained by the fact that the intellectual activities with signs of language (action selection, classification, combination, transformation, and so on.) are based on the knowledge of the paradigmatic and the syntagmatic relations of elements of the language system. However, these skills and knowledge provide a component of language as a linguistic process to the use of language in speech activity. This material can be used in the research and teaching activities of a given problem.


References:

1. 
   Akhundov A.A. (1988). General Linguistics. (pp. 149-150). Baki, (In the Azerbaijani Language).
   
2. 
   Jaffarov S.A., Garayev A.H., & Jaffarova K.A. (1981). A Short Dictionary of European Originated Words. (pp. 175-176, 236). Baki, (In the Azerbaijani Language).
   
3. 
   Kazimov G. (2004). Modern Azerbaijani Language, Syntax. (p.40, 496p). Baki, “Aspoligraph LTD” MMC. (In the Azerbaijani Language).
   
4. 
   Rajably A. (2003). Theoretical Linguistics. (p.515). Baki, “Nurlan”. (In the Azerbaijani Language).
   
5. 
   Seyyidov Y. (1992). Word Combinations in the Azerbaijani Language, Second Edition with Additions. (p.408). Baki University Publishing House, (In the Azerbaijani Language).
   
6. 
   Античные теории языка и стиля. (1960). (c.244). Баку.
   
7. 
   Бодуэн де Куртэнэ И.А. (1963). Избранные труды по общему языкознанию, т.11, (p.198). Москва.
   
8. 
   Виноградов В.В. (1952). Синтаксические взгляды и наблюдения академика Л.В.Щербы. (c. 56). «Ученые записки Московского университета», выпуск 150, Русский язык.
   
9. 
   Гвоздев А.Н. (1958). Современный русский литературный язык, ч.П, Синтаксис. (cc.34 - 39). Москва.
   
10. 
    Соссюр Ф. (2004). Курс общей лингвистики, (256 с). Москва: УРСС. Реформатский А.А. (1955). Введение в языкознание. (cc.253-254). Москва.
    
11. 
    Скепская Г.И. (1979). Введение в синтагматику. (cc.4-5). Москва. Словарь иностранных слов, (1949). (p.595). Москва.
    
12. 
    Ученые записки Московского Университета, вып. 150. (1952). Русский язык. (c.59). Москва.