Kate Warrington, Natasha Kovalyova, and Cindy King
192
W
R
IT
IN
G
SP
AC
E
S 3
ities, which may be the goal of the source. For example, Lisa writes in her
reading journal about Kasper Hauser’s “Skymaul”—a
parody of the Sky-
Mall catalog that used to be found in most airlines’ seatback pockets. She
understands that Kasper Hauser is poking fun at consumer culture while
realizing that she is an active part of that culture:
We don’t necessarily need any of the things advertised in the media
or even in magazines though we more than often desire the things
that might not even benefit our everyday lives…
I find the pepper
self-spray quite ironic; maybe it’s just me but sometimes I feel like
I’m actually pepper spraying myself when I purchase such things
like are sold in the Skymall catalogue because maybe it just wasn’t
worth it or it didn’t function as advertised. (Lisa (pseudonym).
Reader Response to “Skymaul?”).
In
her response, Lisa knows that Kasper Hauser is presenting a par-
ticular side of the argument about consumer culture. Viewing the parody
makes her feel a bit stupid for participating in this kind of culture—like
she’s “pepper spraying” herself. Kasper Hauser’s “Skymaul” is biased be-
cause it only presents one side of
the argument about consumerism, and
it makes the reader aware of his or her place in the culture the group cri-
tiques—even causing the viewer to feel guilty or stupid for being part of
that culture.
Using biased sources in your research can be problematic, particularly
if you do not acknowledge that the source is biased. When you are en-
gaging in critical reading assignments and/or
evaluating sources for your
research, ask yourself these questions to determine the degree to which a
source is biased:
3. Is the author using emotional appeals/manipulation in his or
her argument?
4. Does the author use “loaded” language to distract readers from
relevant reasons and evidence?
Sometimes authors dismiss opposing arguments by claiming that these
arguments are “uninformed” or “nonsensical.” Some
less savvy authors will
be as bold as to claim another viewpoint is “stupid.” Watch for these kinds
of words because they are signs of bias.