Icji 406e trafficking in heroin instruction no



Yüklə 26 Kb.
tarix12.05.2017
ölçüsü26 Kb.
    Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
  • Comment
ICJI 406E TRAFFICKING IN HEROIN
INSTRUCTION NO.
In order for the defendant to be guilty of Trafficking in heroin, the state must prove:

1. On or about [date]

2. in the state of Idaho

3. the defendant [name] [possessed] [manufactured] [or] [delivered] any amount of cocaine,

4. the defendant knew it was heroin, and

5. [possessed][manufactured] [or] [delivered] at least [ ] of heroin or any mixture or substance with a detectable amount of heroin.


If any of the above has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. If each of the above has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty.

Comment

I.C. § 37–2732B(a)(6).


If the defendant is charged with "second offense" drug trafficking, IC § 37–2732B(a)(7), that issue should be presented in a bifurcated proceeding as provided in ICJI 1601.
It was error for the verdict form, in combination with jury instruction for manufacturing, to fail to require a finding by the jury that the manufacturing was done knowingly. State v. Palmer, 138 Idaho 931, 71 P.3d 439 (Ct. App. 2003).

Yüklə 26 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2020
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə