DISCUSSION
Forest types represented. – In the past many attempts have
been made to classify the forests of Sri Lanka using floristic
(de Rosayro, 1950; Gaussen et al., 1966), bioclimatic and
physiognomic (Greller & Balasubramaniam, 1993; Koelmeyer,
1957) characteristics (Table 4). The floristic analysis of the
present study reveals that the Hinidumkanda vegetation
represents both the Dipterocarpus and Vitex-Dillenia
(Wormia)-Chaetocarpus-Anisophyllea communities of the
wet evergreen forest climax formation of de Rosayro’s
classification and the lowland mesophyllous evergreen
dipterocarp rain forests of Greller & Balasubramaniam. The
Sinhagala vegetation, on the other hand, represents the
Mesua-Doona (Shorea) community of de Rosayro; but in
Greller & Balasubramaniam’s classification, the distinction
between these coastal and inland lowland forest communities
of de Rosayro has not been made. The presence of several
abundant species in Tibbottagala (670 – 900), which are also
found in both Hinidumkanda (300–668 m) and Suriyakanda
(950–1050 m), suggests that the Tibbottagala vegetation
represents an ecotone between lowland and lower-montane
forests of this region. In Tibbottagala, Mesua nagassarium
is replaced by Calophyllum trapezifolium as one of the most
abundant canopy species.
Floristically, the Suriyakanda vegetation conforms to the
submontane evergreen forests of Koelmeyer (1957), Doona-
Calophyllum-Syzygium series of Gaussen et al. (1966), and
Fig. 6. A stand of Loxococcus rupicola (Araceae) on steep rocky
slopes near Handapan Ella.
17
THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2005
Fig. 7. Classification (Two-Way Indicator Species Analyses) of 62 plots sampled in the hill forests of Hinidumkanda (plots Y1– Y10, Z1–
Z10), Sinhagala ( A11 – A21, B11 – B21) and Tibbottagala ( A33 – A42, B33 – B42) in southwest Sri Lanka, using abundance data of each
species. The indicator species and the eigen values at each division are also given.
the lower montane notophyllous evergreen dipterocarp rain
forests of Greller & Balasubramaniam (1993). de Rosayro has
not recognised this as a distinct forest type in his
classification. The Handapan Ella vegetation, characterized
by the absence of Shorea gardneri, corresponds to the lower
montane notophyllous evergreen mixed rain forests of Greller
& Balasubramaniam (1993). This distinct forest type has been
overlooked in other forest classifications. The floristic data
in our study support the forest classifications based on
distinct floristic assemblages although no single classification
7
4
4
Plots: Sinhagala 22,
Hiniduma 20 and
Tibottagala 20
17
A41
B41
A42
B42
A37
B37
A38
B38
B35
A36
A17
B17
A18
B18
A12
A13,B13
A14,B14
A15,B15
A16,B16
A19,B19
A11
B11
B12
A20
B20
A21
A21
A39
B39
A40
B40
12
A33
B33
A34
B34
A35
A36
4
2
10
11
6
10
5
7
Y10
Z10
Y7
Z7
Y8
Z8
Y9
Z9
Y5
Z5
Y6
Z6
Z4
Y1
Z1
Y2
Z2
Y3
Z3
Y4
4
2
6
20 Plots
6
15
32
8
42 Plots
Upper
slope
plots
Valley
plots
Sinhagala
Summit
plots
Lower
slope
plots
Hinidumkanda
Tibbottagala
High
plateau
plots
Valley
plots
Steep
slope
plots
Slope
plots
Valley
plots
Ridge
plots
0.302
0.22
Chionanthus
albidiflora 1
Dillenia
retusa 1
Mesua
nagassarium 1
Gyrinops
walla 1
0.384
0.322
0.402
0.386
0.290
0.422
0.366
0.37
Cyathocalyx zeylanica 1
Vitex altissima 1
Calophyllum moonii 1
Cullenia ceylanica 1
Bhesa ceylanica 1
Nothopegia
beddomei 1
Agrosti-
stachys
coriacea 1
Humboldtia
laurifolia 1
Palaquium
laevifolium 1
Shorea
worthingtonii 1
0.383
Palaquium 1
canaliculatum
Garcinia sp. 1
Axinandra
zeylanica 1
Garcinia
quaesita 1
Campnosperma
zeylanicum 2
Palaquium
petiolare 4
Timonius
flavescens 1
Less steep
slopes & +ive
border-line
plots
18
Gunatilleke et al.: South-western Hill Forests of Sri Lanka
Sinhagala
plots
Tibbottagala
plots
Hinidumkanda
plots
High plateau
plots
Valley
plots
Less steep
slope plots
Borderline plots
-ve
+
ve
Lower
slope
plots
Upper
Slope
Plots
Valley
plots
Summit
plots
valley
plots
Ridge & steep
slope plots
Steep slope
plots
Axis 2
Axis 1
Fig. 8. Ordination (Detrended Correspondence Analysis) on the 62 plots sampled in the hill forests of Hinidumkanda (plots Y1 –Y10, Z1 –
Z10), Sinhagala (A11–A21, B11–B21) and Tibbottagala (A33– A42, B33–B42) in southwest Sri Lanka, using abundance data of each
species. The plot distributions in the ordination diagram are indicated by the plot number used in field sampling.
Table 3. Numbers of species in the south-western hill forests of Hinidumkanda (Hinidum.), Sinhagala and/or Tibbottagala (Tibbott.) in
different categories of the 2003 IUCN Red List. CR = critically endangered, EN= endangered, VU = vulnerable, LR/cd = lower risk:
conservation dependent; RIRL, NIRL = number of species recorded and not recorded in the Red List, respectively.
Study Sites Sampled
CR
EN
VU
LR/cd
Sub Total:
Sub Total: Total
RIRL
NIRL
Hinidumkanda only
6
4
16
–
26
42
68
Sinhagala only
3
2
3
–
8
6
14
Tibbottagala only
1
1
2
–
4
11
15
Hinidumkanda & Sinhagala
3
2
10
–
15
4
19
Hinidumkanda & Tibbottagala
1
2
1
–
4
13
17
Sinhagala & Tibbottagala
8
–
6
–
14
12
26
Hinidum., Sinhagala & Tibbot.
9
5
28
4
46
19
65
Total in all three sites
31
16
66
4
117
107
224
Individual Study Sites
Total in Hinidumkanda
19
13
55
4
91
78
169
Total in Sinhagala
23
9
47
4
83
41
124
Total in Tibbottagala
19
8
37
4
68
55
123
19
THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2005
recognised all the different forest communities encountered
in our survey. Interestingly, the six forests quantitatively
sampled by us, along this altitudinal gradient some 80 km
direct east from the south-west coast represent five different
forest types.
This study emphasizes the need for a quantitative analysis of
a much larger database including those from other forests in
the south-western region of Sri Lanka in order to identify
distinct floristic communities facilitating a review the existing
forest classifications in a more objective manner recognising
at the same time micro-scale habitat variations to capture the
habitats of localised endemics.
Floristic variation. – Both TWINSPAN and DCA of pooled
plots of the three hill forests revealed the presence of distinct
floristic communities akin to those described in literature along
the altitudinal gradient at landscape level. Separation of plots
in each of the three hill forests along axes 1 and 2 in the DCA
provides quantitative evidence for the presence of distinct
forest communities in the coastal lowland (Hinidumkanda),
interior mid-elevational (Sinhagala) and lower montane/
ecotone (Tibbottagala) hill forests confirming previous
qualitative classifications of the vegetation. The only
exception was the overlap of four steep slope plots (A39,
B39, A40 and B40) in Tibbottagala with the ridge and steep
slope plot cluster in Sinhagala (Fig. 8), owing to the higher
proportion of species shared between them.
Both analyses indicated a finer scale separation of floristically
recognizable local communities in valleys, lower and upper
slopes and high plateau or summit plots in each hill forest.
However, the plots on the ridges, summits or plateaux, slopes
and valleys in each hill forest separated from their counterparts
in both analyses suggesting their distinctiveness. This
provides evidence for spatial heterogeneity and ecological
differentiation of tree species along the finer-level climatic
and topographic gradients and consequently, provides the
scientific underpinning for conservation management
planning of these forests.
The presence of distinct species assemblages on the ridges,
slopes and valleys, along the altitudinal gradient of the Mesua-
Shorea (Doona) community in hilly topography has been
further supported by census data of the 25 ha Forest Dynamics
Plot (FDP) in Sinharaja, where all free standing woody plants
> 1 cm dbh have been enumerated and plotted on a contour
map (Gunatilleke et al., 2004). This FDP plot spans an elevation
range of only 150 m; yet it depicts eight different habitats
based on topography, convexity and slope. Further, at least
for some canopy dominant taxa, the ecophysiological
adaptations of their seedlings to micro-climatic gradients of
light, moisture and soil nutrients along the topographic
gradient during early establishment and recruitment phases
have been shown (Ashton et al., 1995; Gunatilleke et al.,
1996,1997,1998). All these studies, including the present study,
show habitat specialization of plants along small scale
gradients in the hill forests of Sri Lanka, which has important
Table 4. The south-western hill forests of the present study according to different forest classifications in the literature.
Forest classification of
Hill forests
sampled in
de Rosayro
Koelmeyer
Gaussen et al.
Greller & Balasub-
present study
(1950)
(1957)
(1966)
ramaniam (1993)
Hinidumakanda
Dipterocarpus
Tropical wet
Doona-Dipterocarpus
Lowland mesophyllous
community
evergreen
Mesua series
evergreen dipterocarp rain
forests
forests
Vitex-Dillenia-
Chaetocarpus-
Anisopyllea
community
Sinhagala
Mesua-Doona
Tropical wet
Doona-Dipterocarpus
Lowland mesophyllous
community
evergreen
Mesua series
evergreen dipterocarp rain
forests
forests
Tibbottagala
Mesua-Doona
Tropical wet
Doona-Dipterocarpus
Lowland mesophyllous
community
evergreen
Mesua series
evergreen dipterocarp rain
forests
forests
Suriyakanda
Not recognized
Submontane
Doona-Dipterocarpus
Lower montane mesophyllous
evergreen
Syzygium series
evergreen dipterocarp rain
forests
forests
Handapan Ella
Not recognized
Not
Not
Lower montane mesophyllous
recognized
recognized
evergreen mixed rain forests
20
Gunatilleke et al.: South-western Hill Forests of Sri Lanka
conservation implications considering the fact that many of
these species are relict endemics.
Localized distribution of threatened species. – Comparison
of the species in the IUCN Red List (Table 3) in the three
quantitatively sampled forests, shows that 43% of the 224
species identified were found only in one of the three sites,
depicting very localized distribution of these species,
particularly in Hinidumkanda with as many as 68 species.
With 169 tree species it is also the richest among the study
sites sampled. Among the endangered species in the IUCN
Red list that are highly restricted in their distribution and
enumerated in Hinidumkanda are Shorea dyeri, S. lissophylla
and Diospyros oppositifolia. The results of this study also
show that tree species richness decreases with altitude,
Hinidumkanda ranking highest and Handapan Ella the lowest,
the latter probably being also due to the smaller extent of
forest studied. On the other hand most, if not all, studies in
Sri Lanka, including our own, have so far failed to investigate
the diversity of the herbaceous and lower plant floras,
components of the vegetation known to increase in diversity
with altitude.
The remaining forests in southwest Sri Lanka represent only
a small fraction of less than 9% of their original extent. Today
even these are also highly fragmented, most small in extent,
with receding boundaries due to a multitude of human impacts.
Hinidumkanda is one of the few protected areas that represent
the Dipterocarpus community. High point-endemism and high
habitat specialization in Sri Lanka’s rain forest species
demands that the remaining forests in its south-western
quarter, however disturbed or fragmented they are, need to
be conserved with a sense of urgency. Among these are the
representatives of the Dipterocarpus community in the coastal
belt and hill forests and high plateaux of the Rakwana-
Deniyaya hill range representing the lower montane
notophyllous evergreen mixed/Dipterocarp rain forests.
Compared to these forests types, the Mesua-Doona
community is better protected in the Sinharaja and the
Kanneliya-Dediyagala-Nakiyadeniya groups of forests.
Conservation issues. – In response to criticism mounted
against the first Forestry Master Plan for Sri Lanka (Anon.,
1986) and subsequent assessment of the environmental
implications of the Forestry Sector Development Project,
an Environmental Management component was included
in this project (Anon., 1997). This component was
mandated to evaluate all remaining natural forests in the
country with respect to their importance for biodiversity,
in terms of ecosystem and species diversity, and their value
for soil and water conservation. This study, commonly
referred to as the National Conservation Review (NCR),
inventoried and analysed the data of selected groups of
plant and animal species in 204 forests in the island. Among
the recommendations of the NCR, those related to the
present study are, (a) all montane forests should be strictly
protected by upgrading the status of proposed reserves
to conservation forests, or even national heritage
wilderness areas; and (b) the largest remaining forests in
the wet zone should be designated in their entirety as
conservation forests, inter alia, Sinharaja complex (a group
of 13 forests including Handapan Ella Plains, Diyadawa
and Dellawa) and broader Kanneliya, Nakiyadeniya and
Dediyagala (KDN) complex so that the long-term
conservation of biodiversity could be ensured.
The biological value of the forests in close proximity to the
northern, western and southern borders of the Sinharaja World
Heritage Site (WHS) has been recognised and identified as
conservation forests, based on recommendations of the NCR.
However, forests along the eastern perimeter of the Sinharaja
WHS, where part of this study has focused (Suriyakanda and
Handapan Ella), have yet to receive the attention they merit.
These areas were not adequately surveyed for their biological
wealth even during the NCR. With respect to plants, they
harbour an exceptionally diverse herbaceous and epiphytic
flora including orchids, balsams, ferns, bryophytes, lichens,
fungi & algae, a component of the vegetation in all
ecosystems, which was not studied by the NCR and for that
matter, has almost entirely been neglected in Sri Lankan
biodiversity surveys.
Therefore, relying entirely on the NCR as the source of
quantitative scientific information for purposes of
conservation planning could lead to serious omissions of
areas rich in herbaceous and epiphytic plants which are at
greater threat of extinction considering their sensitivity to
habitat alteration and habitat size decrease. Consequently,
due to the dearth of adequate scientific information,
particularly with respect to the rich flora of herbaceous and
lower-plant taxa, some areas of the Rakwana-Deniyaya hills
are not included in the current protected area system. Hence,
they are in imminent danger of being degraded further through
poaching, timber and firewood harvesting, cardamom
cultivation, illicit gem prospecting and other activities inimical
to biodiversity.
Forest degradation and destruction. – The threats to the
many fragile ecosystems of the Handapan Ella plains appear
to be extensive, particularly in the grasslands and stream
banks, where thousands of gem pits (most ~1 m deep) have
been dug over the years. These illegal encroachers have caused
extensive damage to the forest by cutting wood and poaching
animals in this fragile ecosystem.
In early 2004 there was an even more sinister threat to the
relict forest fragments adjoining the eastern boundary of the
Sinharaja WHS, despite repeated requests and
recommendations made to annex them to the Sinharaja WHS
to increase its conservation value. Instead, these state-owned
forest lands were blocked out and sold for tea and cardamom
cultivation. This irresponsible act, amidst public protests,
including those of scientists familiar with the biological wealth
of the region and its conservation value, has irreparably
damaged this fragile ecosystem, critically endangering some
of the threatened animal and plant taxa exclusive to the
Rakwana-Deniyaya hills.
The forests near the south-eastern boundary of the
Sinharaja WHS abutting the Sinharaja Division of the
21
THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2005
Ensalwatta Plantation and also Beverley and Manikkawatta
Estates are on long-term lease to plantation companies.
These appear to be relatively free of any encroachments
for gem prospecting and wood-cutting. The forests
surrounding the Sinharaja Division of the Ensalwatta
Plantation represent Shorea gardneri (Sinhala: Rath Dun)
and Shorea trapezifolia (S: Yakahalu Dun) tree formations
at their very best (Figs. 9, 10). These magnificent forest
stands, traversed by streams and spectacular waterfalls,
harbour abundant wildlife, including a small herd of
elephants, and are an important watershed for the
downstream communities.
Similarly, forests in the highest peaks of the Rakwana-
Deniyaya hills, viz., Abbey Rock (1300 m) and Gongala (1358
m), those near Panilkanda and Aninkanda estates, Naigala,
Kabaragala, Beralagala, Suriyakanda and Kurulugala deserve
to be conserved. Apart from a few explorations for taxonomic
and preliminary ecological study purposes, their conservation
value is yet to be evaluated and documented (Jayasuriya et
al., 1993). Several animal species endemic to the Rakwana-
Deniyaya hills and new to science have been collected from
this region (Bahir & Ng, 2005; Manamendra-Arachchi &
Pethiyagoda, 2005; Pethiyagoda & Manamendra-Arachchi,
1998).
Extension of the current eastern boundary of the Sinharaja
WHS to include these forests within an appropriate protected-
area category is proposed once again (Gunatilleke & Ashton,
1987), as an urgent measure to conserve their rich biodiversity.
The presence of a small herd of elephants in the Rakwana-
Deniyaya hills is an important criterion for establishing a
wildlife reserve in this region. Their migratory routes need to
be studied in order to demarcate and establish habitat corridors
connecting the surrounding forests, particularly to the north
of the Rakwana-Deniyaya hills. As a dwindling population of
elephants similar to that inhabiting the Peak Wilderness area,
a conservation management plan for wet zone elephants
should also be considered. The role of the elephant in the
functioning of these complex rain forests is virtually unknown.
Such a study would especially benefit nature-based tourism
in this region.
The issues highlighted in this paper should be addressed
coherently with a sense of urgency, before the next wave of
‘development’ overwhelms Sri Lanka. Conservation planning
for Sri Lanka’s south-western region should not be done
piece-meal or on a short-term basis, but at landscape level
that takes long-term impacts into consideration. Appropriate
corridors and buffer zones including multi-species home
gardens, where appropriate, could be used to link the different
ecosystems and forest types in this region.
The present study provides sound evidence that the south-
western hills and, the Rakwana-Deniyaya range of lower
montane forests in particular, indeed possess high
conservation value. However, they have hitherto remained
relatively unprotected owing to their biological and ecological
value not having been adequately assessed in previous
biological surveys. We hope that this study will serve as a
stimulus for demarcating such high-priority conservation
landscapes (both protected and yet unprotected) along the
Gin Ganga basin from its headwaters in the Gongala area
through southern Sinharaja, KDN complex and Hinidumkanda
and remaining mangroves, together with the Hikkaduwa
Marine sanctuary seascape beyond its confluence with the
Indian Ocean at Gintota as an integrated model river basin
landscape-seascape conservation area. Where feasible,
linking of neighbouring forest areas through restoration
corridors with already available research experience for this
region Gunatilleke (1999) is also strongly recommended. The
stratigraphic profile accompanying the map of the south-west
Sri Lanka in Fig. 5 provides some directions for the initial
identification of the relevant areas for this exercise.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |