|
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 19
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Table 3-1: Vegetation communities previously mapped in the Mt Mulgine Project Area
Vegetation Unit Code
Description
Thickets and Scrubs
T1
Thicket to Dense Thicket dominated by Acacia ramulosa var. ramulosa
over a Low Scrub of mixed species over Herbs on red loamy soils with
some gravel.
T2
Thicket to Scrub dominated by Acacia acuminata over Dwarf Scrub or
Herbs on red loamy-clay.
T4
Thicket to Scrub dominated by Melaleuca hamata, Allocasuarina
acutivalvis ?subsp. prinsepiana and Acacia species on red loamy-clay
on rocky ground.
Woodlands
W1
Open Low Woodland of mixed Eucalyptus species over Thicket to Scrub
of Acacia species over a Dwarf Scrub of mixed species over Herbs on
red loamy soils with gravel.
W2
Open Low Woodland of Eucalyptus salmonophloia and Eucalyptus
loxophleba subsp. supralaevis over Open Scrub on red silty clay with
quartz pebbles.
W4
Low Woodland of Eucalyptus sheathiana and Eucalyptus ?striaticalyx
over Low Scrub of mixed shrubs over Open Herbs on red loamy-clay on
rocky ground.
W9
Low Woodland to Scrub dominated by Allocasuarina acutivalvis
?subsp. prinsepiana on red-brown soils on rocky ground.
Source: Woodman (2003)
3.1.3
Conservation Significant Vegetation Communities
Four PECs and one TEC listed under the WC Act were identified as occurring within 30 km of the Project area:
•
‘Blue Hills (Mount Karara/Mungada Ridge/Blue Hills) vegetation complexes (banded ironstone
formation (BIF))’ (Priority 1 PEC – WC Act);
•
‘Minjar and Chulaar Hills vegetation complexes (BIF) (Priority 1 PEC – WC Act);
•
‘Mount Gibson Range vegetation complexes (BIF)’ (Priority 1 PEC – WC Act);
•
‘Ninghan calcrete groundwater assemblage type on Moore palaeodrainage on Ninghan Station’
(Priority 1 PEC – WC Act); and
•
‘Warriedar Hill/Pinyalling vegetation complexes’ (BIF) (Priority 1 PEC – WC Act).
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 20
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
3.1.4
Introduced Flora
Two invasive plant taxa listed as MNES were identified by the PMST as likely to occur in the vicinity of the
Project area; Cenchrus ciliaris (Buffel-grass) and Eichhornia crassipes (Water hyacinth).
3.2
F
IELD
S
URVEY
3.2.1
Vegetation Communities
The survey recorded 117 flora taxa belonging to 79 genera. Prior to analyses, all annual species were removed
as they were mostly of low quality where applied field names were likely forming aggregate. Therefore,
analyses were reliant on shrub / perennial vegetation considered as dominant and were persistent within the
landscape. The analyses were thus conducted on a total of 59 species belonging to 35 genera. Following pre-
processing of the data an additional two releves considered outliers following nearest neighbour method were
removed (Figure 3-2).
Step 1. Evaluation of classification techniques
Figure 3-2: Suggested Outlying Quadrats
Figure 3-3 illustrates the nine top performing classification methods identified by OptimClass 1.
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 21
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Figure 3-3: Top Performing Classification Methods
The classification technique involving No transformation (Norm), Bray-Curtis distance and Flexible beta (-0.25)
clustering was used for subsequent analyses. Further the results suggest the taxa can be assigned to ten
communities nested into five alliances
Figure 3-4
..
Figure 3-4: Dendrogram of Tungsten Phytosociological Data Produced using No Data Transformation, Bray-
Curtis Distance and Flexible Beta (-0.25) Clustering Algorithm
The program for vegetation classification ‘JUICE’ was used to produce final classifications and community
descriptions (fingerprint). Fingerprints describe the floristic communities including diagnostic (using Fishers Phi
co-efficient), constant (occurring in more than 60% of the quadrats within the community) and dominant (with
a cover >25% within the quadrat) species.
CCA (
Ter Braak, 1986
) were then undertaken to assist in the ecological interpretation of the floristic
communities. This analysis utilises the phytosociological and environmental data. Results of the analyses are
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
10
20
30
40
Fait
h
fu
l s
p
ecie
s
Cluster
LgR.ManFB
PaR.ManFB
NormBcFB
LgBcSINGLE
LgR.ManUPGMA
NormR.ManUPGMA
FloatingEucWard
PsEucWard
PsJaccardFB
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 22
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
shown in Figure 3-5. Communities of the MMP are situated within sand to sandy loam area of the soil texture
gradient adopted from Minasny and McBratney (2001) and Holbeche (2008) (Figure 3-6).
Figure 3-5: CCA of the Project Area using Environmental and Phytosociological Data
Figure 3-6: Position of Communities along Soil Texture Gradient
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 23
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Sand, clay and silt box plots of the floristic communities indicated vegetation communities 1 to 5 and 8 had
very similar soil properties. However, the properties of soil from Communities 7, 9 and 10 differed to the other
communities (Figure 3-7). The vertical grey line indicates community mean and the shaded area is +/- 1
standard deviation.
Figure 3-7: Sand, Silt and Clay Box Plots of Floristic Communities
Analyses of coarse fragments, bulk density, effective cation exchange capacity and total nitrogen properties
indicated most communities had similar soil properties. However, these soil properties were notably different
in Community 9. Vegetation communities 3 and 7 also had higher bulk density and coarse fragments
respectively. Coarse fragments were also much higher in Community 10 than those of other communities.
Results of the box plots are shown in Figure 3-8.
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 24
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Figure 3-8: Coarse Fragments, Bulk Density, Effective Cation Exchange Capacity and Total Nitrogen Box Plots
of Floristic Communities
The final alliances and vegetation communities from the analyses are described in
Table 3-2
to
Table 3-6
.
Vegetation communities of the Project area are shown in
Figure 3-9
.
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 25
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Table 3-2: Vegetation communities of Alliance A in the Mt Mulgine Project Area
Alliance A
Description
Eucalyptus sp. A
1
, open woodland on mixed Acacia shrubland, dominated by Austrostipa scabra and
Ptilotus obovatus
Diagnostic
species:
Acacia andrewsii, Acacia ramulosa, Acacia tetragonophylla, Austrostipa elegantissima, Austrostipa
scabra, Austrostipa variabilis, Cuscuta agg., Enchylaena tomentosa, Eremophila clarkei, Eriachne
pulchella, Eucalyptus sp. A, Exocarpos aphyllus, Lobelia rhytidosperma, Maireana georgei, Ptilotus
obovatus, Scaevola spinescens, Sclerolaena diacantha, Senna artemisioides subsp. filifolia, Senna
artemisioides subsp. petiolaris, Sida calyxhymenia, Sida ectogama, Solanum agg.
Constant
species:
Austrostipa variabilis, Ptilotus obovatus, Solanum agg.
Dominant
species:
Austrostipa scabra, Ptilotus obovatus.
Habitat:
Sandy loam soils
Communities
Community 1
Eucalyptus sp. A, open woodland on mixed Acacia andrewsii, Enchylaena tomentosa, Maireana
georgei & Ptilotus obovatus shrubland over Austrostipa variabilis grassland.
Community 2
Ptilotus obovatus & Scaevola spinescens shrubland over Austrostipa scabra grassland.
Photo plate:
1
Formal identification to be confirmed
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 26
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Table 3-3: Vegetation communities of Alliance B in the Mt Mulgine Project Area
Alliance B
Description
Eucalyptus sp. A woodland over mixed Acacia spp. including dominating A. ramulosa and Eremophila
shrublands with Eremophila clarkei, E. decipiens and E. oldfieldii
Diagnostic
species:
Acacia andrewsii, Acacia exocarpoides, Acacia ramulosa, Acacia tetragonophylla, Arthropodium
dyeri, Austrostipa elegantissima, Dianella revoluta, Eremophila clarkei, Eremophila decipiens subsp.
decipiens, Eremophila oldfieldii, Eucalyptus sp. 1 JT ID, Exocarpos aphyllus, Grevillea didymobotrya
subsp. didymobotrya, Jacksonia sp., Maireana georgei, Maireana trichoptera, Ptilotus obovatus,
Ptilotus helipteroides, Ptilotus divaricatus, Rhagodia drummondii, Sclerolaena diacantha, Senna
artemisioides subsp. filifolia, Senna artemisioides subsp. petiolaris, Sida calyxhymenia, Solanum agg.,
Stenopetalum sp.
Constant
species:
Acacia ramulosa, Acacia tetragonophylla, Austrostipa elegantissima, Eucalyptus sp. A, Maireana
georgei, Maireana trichoptera, Ptilotus obovatus, Rhagodia drummondii
Dominant
species:
Acacia ramulosa, Eucalyptus sp. A
Habitat:
Sandy loam soils (See Fig. 4), small course fragments, high bulk density & total nitrogen higher than
average.
Communities
Community 3
Alliance B does not split into separate community at lower hierarchical levels, and is also named
Community 3.
Photo plate:
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 27
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Table 3-4: Vegetation communities of Alliance C in the Mt Mulgine Project Area
Alliance C
Description
Acacia shrublands dominated by A. assimilis and A. ramulosa, interspersed with combination of
myrtaceous shrubs including Melaleuca eleuterostachya and M. stereophloia, and Allocasuarina
dielsiana.
Diagnostic
species:
Acacia acuminata, Acacia assimilis, Acacia exocarpoides, Acacia ramulosa, Acacia tetragonophylla,
Allocasuarina dielsiana, Austrostipa scabra, Austrostipa variabilis, Borya sphaerocephala, Cuscuta
agg , Dianella revoluta, Dodonaea inaequifolia, Eremophila alternifolia, Eremophila georgei, Eriachne
benthamii, Lobelia rhytidosperma, Melaleuca eleuterostachya, Melaleuca stereophloia, Ptilotus
obovatus, Ptilotus helipteroides, Sida ectogama, Solanum agg.
Constant
species:
Acacia ramulosa, Acacia tetragonophylla, Cuscuta agg.
Dominant
species:
Acacia assimilis, Acacia ramulosa
Habitat:
Sandy loam soils occur across all communities with exception of Community 7 (C7). Communities 4,
5 & 6 contain small (below average) coarse fragments whilst C7 contains larger fragments.
Communities
Community 4
Acacia ramulosa and A. assimilis woodland over A. tetragonophylla, Melaleuca eleuterostachya, M.
stereophloia, and Allocasuarina dielsiana shrubs.
Community 5
Mixed shrubland of Pimelea avonensis, Hybanthus floribundus subsp. curvifolius, Acacia acuminata,
Eremophila granitica and Cryptandra imbricata. Acacia acuminata and Allocasuarina not forming
dominant (>25%) shrub layer.
Community 6
Mixed shrublands with Eremophila decipiens subsp. decipiens, Ptilotus helipteroides and Senna
artemisioides subsp. filifolia over Eriachne pulchella grassland. Acacia spp. not forming dominant
shrubland strata.
Community 7
Allocasuarina dielsiana and Acacia acuminata open woodland over Melaleuca eleuterostachya,
Eremophila oldfieldii and Thyridolepis multiculmis shrubland.
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 28
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Photo plate:
A: Community 4, B: Community 5, C: Community 6, D: Community 7
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 29
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Table 3-5: Vegetation communities of Alliance D in the Mt Mulgine Project Area
Alliance D
Description
Acacia acuminata, Allocasuarina dielsiana and Melaleuca stereophloia dominated woodlands over
mixed Acacia spp.
Diagnostic
species:
Acacia acuminata, Acacia tetragonophylla, Allocasuarina acutivalvis subsp. prinsepiana,
Allocasuarina dielsiana, Arthropodium dyeri, Austrostipa elegantissima, Austrostipa scabra,
Austrostipa variabilis, Bulb sp., Cryptandra imbricata, Cryptandra sp., Cuscuta agg , Dianella
revoluta, Dodonaea inaequifolia, Eremophila granitica, Eremophila alternifolia, Eremophila clarkei,
Eremophila georgei, Eremophila oldfieldii, Eriachne pulchella, Grevillea didymobotrya subsp.
didymobotrya, Hybanthus floribundus subsp. curvifolius, Jacksonia sp., Melaleuca eleuterostachya,
Melaleuca nematophylla, Melaleuca stereophloia, Pimelea avonensis, Ptilotus obovatus, Sida
calyxhymenia, Solanum agg , Stenopetalum sp., Thyridolepis multiculmis
Constant
species:
Acacia acuminata
Dominant
species:
Acacia acuminata, Allocasuarina dielsiana, Melaleuca stereophloia
Habitat:
Flat, sandy loam soils.
Communities
Community 8
Alliance D does not split into separate community at lower hierarchical levels and is also named
Community 8.
Photo plate:
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 30
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
Table 3-6: Vegetation communities of Alliance E in the Mt Mulgine Project Area
Alliance E
Description
Acacia latior & Allocasuarina campestris dominated woodlands over Gastrolobium laytonii,
Melaleuca nematophylla and M. scalena shrubs over Eriachne grasses.
Diagnostic
species:
Acacia assimilis, Acacia latior, Allocasuarina campestris, Allocasuarina dielsiana, Arthropodium dyeri,
Borya sphaerocephala, Calycopeplus paucifolius, Cryptandra sp., Cuscuta agg., Eriachne benthamii,
Eriachne pulchella, Gastrolobium laytonii, Melaleuca nematophylla, Melaleuca scalena, Micromyrtus
sp., Philotheca deserti, Thyridolepis multiculmis.
Constant species:
Acacia latior, Calycopeplus paucifolius, Philotheca deserti
Dominant species: Acacia latior, Allocasuarina campestris
Habitat:
Sandy soils, with above average (%) exposed aggregate.
Communities
Community 9
Acacia latior dominated woodlands over Gastrolobium laytonii, Calycopeplus paucifolius and
Philotheca deserti low open shrublands over Eriachne benthamii grass.
Community 10
Allocasuarina campestris dominated woodlands over Micromyrtus sp. A, Cryptandra sp. and
Calycopeplus paucifolius low open shrubland over Eriachne pulchella low open grassland.
Photo plate:
A: Community 9, B: Community 10, C: Community 9 soil profile, D: Community 10 soil profile
L
EVEL
2
B
IOLOGICAL
A
SSESSMENT OF
M
T
M
ULGINE
P
ROJECT
,
W
ESTERN
A
USTRALIA
Page | 31
T
UNGSTEN
M
INING
NL
3.2.2
Vegetation Condition
Vegetation in the Project area has been disturbed historically through mining and exploration activities.
Previous workings and numerous access tracks are evident throughout the Project area. However, the
vegetation has had time to recover and its condition was predominately ‘Very Good’. The exception to this was
the vegetation of Mt Mulgine which was in ‘Good’ condition. Figure 3-10 illustrates vegetation condition of the
Project area.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|