REVIEW
There is one sentence in Danielle’s essay in the past tense: a brief reflection
on her stunted French
four months prior to the scene described. The breezy dismissal of those worries in the rest of the
essay has a certain
je ne sais quoi,
admittedly; however it makes for a strange personal statement.
Persuasive essays as a form are often easier to grasp and consider when they are declarative (“Pick
me because of this.”) or contemplative (“Let us think about this lobster and convince you to pick me
because of my prescient observations about said shellfish.”). This is neither. There is no reflection as
to how she felt before
her experience in France; there is sparse description of her interiority in
general.
But this refusal to engage with the standard mechanisms of personal statements makes Danielle’s
essay stand out. It seems alternatively attractive because of its refusal
to conform to a seemingly
prescribed formula and disappointing because of its reliance on long chunks of hapless dialogue in
order to create an interesting plot.
The essay’s strength is its tone: Danielle writes just casually enough to allow a reader to enjoy the
essay, and creates a refreshing read, maybe because of, rather than in spite of, its lack of angle. But it
is a risky move, and one that could backfire. The safer path, for Danielle, would have been to write
about something more concrete. Her willingness to try something different worked for Danielle and
produced a high-quality essay.
—Christine A. Hurd