Academic/General Training Module by Adam Smith First Published in 2015
Yüklə 0,89 Mb. Pdf görüntüsü
|
- Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- IELTS JOURNAL 164
|
ENGLISH OLD GERMAN
LATIN GREEK SANSKRIT JAPANESE ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE TEN AINS TWAI THRIJA FIDWOR FIMF SAIHS SIBUM AHTAU NIUN TAIHUM UNUS DUO TRES QUATTOUR QUINQUE SEX SEPTEM OCTO NOVEM DECEM HEIS DUO TREIS TETTARES PENTE HEKS HEPTA OKTO ENNEA DEKA EKAS DVA TRYAS CATVARAS PANCA SAT SAPTA ASTA NAVA DASA HITOTSU FUTATSU MITTSU YOTTSU ITSUTSU MUTTSU NANATSU YATTSU KOKONOTSU TO FIGURE 1 Words for numbers from one to ten show the relations among Indo- European languages and the anomalous character of Japanese, which is not part of that family. Such similarities stimulated interest in the origins of Indo-European languages. IELTS JOURNAL 164 The Romance languages served as the first model for answering the question.Even to someone with no knowledge of Latin, the profound similarities among Romance languages would have made it natural to suggest that they were derived from a common ancestor.On the assumption that the shared characteristice of these languages came from the common progenitor (whereas the divergences arose later.as the languages diverged),it would have been possible to reconstruct many of the characteristics of the original proto-language. In much the same way it became clear that the branches of the Indo-European family could be studied and a hypothetical family tree constructed,reading back to a common ancestor:proto-Indo-European. This is the tree approach. The basic process represented by the tree model is one of divergence:when languages become isolated from one other,they differ increasingly,and dialects gradually differentiate until they become separate languages. Divergence is by no means the only possible tendency in language evolution.Johannes Schmidt,introduced a "wave" model in which linguistic changes spared like waves,leading ultimately to convergence;that is, growing similarity among languages that were initially quite different. Today, however, most linguists think primarily in terms of linguistic family trees. It is necessary to construct some explicit models of how language change might occur according to a process-based view. There are four main classes of models. The first is the process of initial colonization, by which an uninhabited territory becomes populated; its language naturally becomes that of the colonizers. Second are processes of divergence, such as the linguistic divergence arising form separation or isolation mentioned above in relation to early models of the Indo-European languages.The third group of models is based on processes of linguistic convergence.The wave model, formulated by Schmidt in the 1870's, is an example, but convergence methods have not generally found favour among linguists. Now,the slow and rather static operation of these processes is complicated by another factor: linguistic replacement. That factor provides the basis for a fourth class of models. In many areas of the world the languages initially spoken by the indigenous people have come to be replaced, fully or partially, by languages spoken by people coming from outside. Were it not for this large complicating factor, the world's linguistic history could be faithfully described by the initial distribution of Homo Sapiens, followed by the gradual, ling-term workings of divergence and convergence.So linguistic replacement also has a key role to play in explaining the origins of the Indo-European languages. |