was established in Japan approximately half a century ago.
It was featured in
publications in Japan as early as 1958 and was expected to become a new method to
conduct viscosity measurements. However, because technology to drive oscillators at
the natural frequency was difficult, the vibration method did not see its way onto the
market for many years.
Today, despite the fact that the production technology has become feasible and the
product has already
been introduced to the market, the “viscosity × density” unit
system has not yet been officially adopted. Therefore, I would like to propose the
adoption of “static viscosity” as the physical quantity for the vibration type, similar to
“kinetic viscosity” for the capillary type and “viscosity” for the rotation type. The
reasons for my proposal are as follows:
- The “kinetic viscosity” (viscosity/density) of the capillary
type can be obtained by
measuring the time taken by a liquid in a vessel of a given volume to go through a flow
channel of a given diameter. Consequently, the physical quantity to be obtained is in
direct proportion to the viscosity while inversely proportional to the density, which
generates the pressure to the fluid. Meanwhile,
this measurement method is
accompanied by a barycenter shift of the liquid as the liquid being measured actually
flows through the inside of the tube. The kinetic viscosity is an indication of this state of
the liquid and can be considered to be accurate.
- In the rotation viscometer, although the liquid is in rotational movement, there is no
shifting of the liquid’s barycenter. Particularly, in the plate-type rotation viscometer, the
“shear rate is constant” due to its measurement principle and only the viscosity value
can be obtained, expressed in terms of rotational torque.
- Unlike the two methods above, in the vibration viscometer, the oscillators are in
reciprocating motion within a liquid. The liquid around the oscillators obtains a “shear
rate,” and the accompanying “shear stress” is in turn loaded to the oscillators. By this
method, there is neither a barycenter shift nor widespread rotational movement of the
liquid, which makes it possible to measure viscosity in the resting state. In addition, the
energy possessed by the measuring system of the vibration type is minimum. This
means that the energy transferred from the measuring
system to a liquid is also
minimized. The vibration type is the only method in which no macro movement of the
liquid is generated. Thus, I would argue that it is reasonable to term the physical
quantity “viscosity × density,” the “static viscosity.” By using the terms “kinetic
viscosity,” “viscosity,” and “static viscosity,” it becomes possible to accurately express the
motion or the state of the liquid measured by each viscosity measuring method.
Examples and Future Prospects of Static Viscosity Measurement
The following are actual measurement examples. In some cases, phenomena that once
seemed impossible in conventional viscosity measurements,
such as cloud point
measurements, have been rendered possible, (See Figures 1, 2, 5, & 6).
-
Engine oil: Measurement of temperature characteristics of oil from the “static
viscosity” of when temperature is changed
-
Cloud point measurement: Detection of the cloud point of a nonionic surface-active
agent from its “static viscosity” change
-
Change from a liquid to a solid: Monitoring the cure process of a protein material
(egg albumen) from its “static viscosity” change
-
Analysis of constituents of a liquid: Inference of constituent elements by measuring
the concentration change of alcohol from the “static viscosity.”
In future measurements of “static viscosity,” applications in the following fields may
also become possible:
-
Evaluating the viscosity of the base material necessary for the measurement of the
Dostları ilə paylaş: