Aura 2016 Supplementary data


Table S3.6 Region of residence and socioeconomic status for patients prescribed systemic antibiotics in the community, 2014



Yüklə 388,53 Kb.
səhifə7/26
tarix12.02.2017
ölçüsü388,53 Kb.
#8296
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   26

Table S3.6 Region of residence and socioeconomic status for patients prescribed systemic antibiotics in the community, 2014


Measure

Category

Percentage of patients prescribed systemic antibioticsa

Jurisdiction

New South Wales

33.8

Jurisdiction

Queensland

30.1

Jurisdiction

Tasmania

30.4

Jurisdiction

Victoria

29.0

Jurisdiction

Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory and Western Australia

26.3

Remoteness

Major cities

31.1

Remoteness

Inner regional

28.2

Remoteness

Outer regional, remote and very remote

29.3

Socioeconomic status (SEIFA quintile)

1–2 (most disadvantaged)

31.3

Socioeconomic status (SEIFA quintile)

3–4

28.7

Socioeconomic status (SEIFA quintile)

5–6

30.5

Socioeconomic status (SEIFA quintile)

7–8

30.7

Socioeconomic status (SEIFA quintile)

9–10 (most advantaged)

30.5

SEIFA = Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas

a Percentage of patients visiting a general practitioner at a clinically representative practice who had one or more prescriptions for systemic antibiotics ordered in 2014

Source: NPS MedicineWise, MedicineInsight Post Market Surveillance Report 3, February 2015.

Figure S3.1 Most commonly dispensed antibiotics in the community, by age group (3-point moving average), quarter 3, 2012 – quarter 4, 2014


panel of line graphs showing the percentage of the population supplied amoxicillin, cephalexin, amoxicillin–clavulanate and doxycycline, by age group over time

panel of line graphs showing the percentage of the population supplied roxithromycin, chloramphenicol (eye), clarithromycin and trimethoprim, by age group over time

panel of line graphs showing the percentage of the population supplied erythromycin, flucloxacillin and cefaclor, by age group over time

Sources: Drug Utilisation Sub Committee; PBS


Table S3.7 Residential aged care facilities participating in the Aged Care National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey pilot, by jurisdiction, remoteness and provider type, 2015


Measure

Category

Number (%)

State

New South Wales

17 (9.1)

State

Queensland

7 (3.8)

State

South Australia

8 (4.3)

State

Tasmania

6 (3.2)

State

Victoria

130 (69.9)

State

Western Australia

18 (9.7)

Remoteness

Major cities

51 (27.4)

Remoteness

Inner regional

81 (43.5)

Remoteness

Outer regional

45 (24.2)

Remoteness

Remote

8 (4.3)

Remoteness

Very remote

1 (0.5)

Provider type

Not for profit

37 (19.9)

Provider type

charitable

9

Provider type

religious

20

Provider type

community based

8

Provider type

Government owned

141 (75.8)

Provider type

state government

140

Provider type

local government

1

Provider type

Private

8 (4.3)

Total

na

186 (100.0)

na = not applicable

Source: acNAPS, 2015



Yüklə 388,53 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   26




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin