Development Planning and Administration Significant Role in Developmental Policy Making: Senior Administrators in
developing countries have been involved in the formulation of crucial policies in
the realms of education, health, agriculture, irrigation, industries, housing,
women and child development and other associated developmental areas. They
have not only performed advisory role in preparing progressive legislations and
policies but have also come out with their own innovative ideas and initiatives in
almost all areas of social concern
One major problem in this sphere has been a multiplicity of policies and a lack of
synthesis among them. Every new political regime or chief executive generally
rejects the policies of predecessors and frames new policies and programmes.
And, administrators have only to follow the directions of their political masters.
Even in the changed situations, their role and importance in policy making
remain crucial to the success of development administration.
Planning System: All developing nations have adopted planning as the key
instrument of development administration. Distinct organisations for plan
formulation and evaluation have been set up at the federal, state, district and
local levels in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and other developing
nations. The approach to socio-economic development is enshrined in plan-
documents and the whole state machinery is expected to cooperate with the
national planning body to implement faithfully the national plans.
Only recently, with the advent of liberalisation and privatisation, the role of
government seems to have been redefined. There is stress on downsizing of the
government and the transfer of development functions to the private sector. This
has reduced the scope for detailed planning, and instead one notices a co-
existence of the traditional government planning and the emergent “indicative”
planning. For example, even the Planning Commission reports of the
Government of India in the early nineties referred to the utility of indicative
planning. For the foreseeable future, the co-existence of detailed sectoral and
indicative planning is most likely to remain.