Out-of-Sample Forecast Evaluation
səhifə 17/23 tarix 01.05.2023 ölçüsü 0,79 Mb. #105443
Ch9 slides
‘Introductory Econometrics for Finance’ © Chris Brooks 2013 They evaluate the forecasts in two ways: The first is by regressing the realised volatility series on the forecasts plus a constant: (7) where is the “actual” value of volatility, and is the value forecasted for it during period t . Perfectly accurate forecasts imply b 0 = 0 and b 1 = 1. But what is the “true” value of volatility at time t ? Day & Lewis use 2 measures 1. The square of the weekly return on the index , which they call SR. 2. The variance of the week’s daily returns multiplied by the number of trading days in that week. Out-of Sample Model Comparisons ‘Introductory Econometrics for Finance’ © Chris Brooks 2013 Encompassing Test Results: Do the IV Forecasts Encompass those of the GARCH Models? ‘Introductory Econometrics for Finance’ © Chris Brooks 2013 ‘Introductory Econometrics for Finance’ © Chris Brooks 2013 Within sample results suggest that IV contains extra information not contained in the GARCH / EGARCH specifications. Out of sample results suggest that nothing can accurately predict volatility! Stochastic Volatility Models ‘Introductory Econometrics for Finance’ © Chris Brooks 2013 It is a common misconception that GARCH-type specifications are stochastic volatility models However, as the name suggests, stochastic volatility models differ from GARCH principally in that the conditional variance equation of a GARCH specification is completely deterministic given all information available up to that of the previous period There is no error term in the variance equation of a GARCH model, only in the mean equation Stochastic volatility models contain a second error term, which enters into the conditional variance equation. Dostları ilə paylaş: