3.2 Ranges
of MNDWI values
The preliminary results of the study reveal that the results of the analysis showed a range of
values from -0.67 to 0.14. It was found that the minimum values correspond to dry
7
E3S Web of Conferences
386
, 01005 (2023)
GISCA 2022 and GI 2022
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338601005
surfaces. Positive maximum values correspond to open surfaces. The latter corresponded to
agricultural areas with seasonal fluctuations (Figures 8, 9, 10, and 11).
Figures
8, 9, 10, and 11 show all monthly changes in the histogram results.
In the bar charts, we can see all the details about the changes at each time of the month.
Statistical distributions of the MNDWI. The final results are histograms. Here, alterations
in the quality of the field can be observed in the study area.
Fig. 8.
a) Types of agricultural coverage in April 2018. b) The result of the histogram in April 2018
(Source: [Compiled by the authors]).
8
E3S Web of Conferences
386
, 01005 (2023)
GISCA 2022 and GI 2022
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338601005
Fig. 9.
a) Types of agricultural coverage in May 2018. b) The result of the histogram in May 2018
(Source: [Compiled by the authors]).
9
E3S Web of Conferences
386
, 01005 (2023)
GISCA 2022 and GI 2022
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338601005
Fig. 10.
a) Types of agricultural coverage in June 2018. b) The result of the histogram in June 2018
(Source: [Compiled by the authors]).
10
E3S Web of Conferences
386
, 01005 (2023)
GISCA 2022 and GI 2022
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338601005
|
