Conclusion Despite the fact that loneliness, as we can
see, is a destructive phenomenon of a person’s
being, which makes it difficult to expand the
boundaries of his spiritual and personal integ-
rity (incomplete loneliness) or exhaustively
leads him to degradation (complete loneliness),
being de facto not immanent to his being, aris-
es at certain stages of an individual’s develop-
ment, which is largely due to the specifics of
the present state of socio-cultural reality. The
more intense the impact exerted by external
(socio-cultural) factors, the faster the bound-
aries of the integrity of the Meeting shrink,
and the faster the processes of degradation of
human integrity unfold. Under the influence
of socio-cultural processes, the boundaries of
spiritual and personal integrity and the inner
world of a person are ‘compressed’ to such an
extent that they cease to fulfill the functions of
life support.
References Belyaev, I.А. (2011). Human Being: Integrity and Wholeness. In Journal of Siberian Federal Univer- sity. Humanities & Social Sciences, 5, 633-643.
Buber, M. (1995). Dva obraza very. Мoscow, Respublika, 464 p.
Erikson, E. (2000). Detstvo i obshchestvo [Childhood and society]. Saint-Peterburg, OOO Rech’, 416 p.
Gert, V.A. (2016). TSelostnost’ i sub“ektivnost’ individual’nogo bytiia cheloveka [Intergrity and sub- jectivity of individual being of a person]. Thesis of the Doctor of Philosophy, CHeliabinsk, 381 p.
Il’enkov, E.V. (1984). CHto zhe takoe lichnost’? S chego nachinaetsia lichnost’ [What is Personality? What does personality start with?]. Мoscow, Politizdat, 319-358.
Kagan, M.S. (1988). Mir obshcheniia: problema mezhsub’ektnykh otnoshenii [The world of communi- cation: the problem of intersubjective relationships]. Мoscow, Politizdat, 319 p.
Kogan, L.N. (1981). Vsestoronnee razvitie lichnosti i kul’tura [Comprehensive development of the per- sonality and culture]. Мoscow, Znaniye, 63 p.
Koptseva, N.P., Bakhova, N.A., Zamaraeva, J.S., Kirko, V.I. (2012). Problema sotsiokul’turnykh issledo-
vaniy v sovremennoy gumanitarnoy nauke [The problem of socio-cultural research in modern humanities].
In Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia [Modern problems of science and education], 3, 323-323.
Korolenko, T.S., Donskikh, T.A. (1991). Sem’ putei k katastrofe. Destruktivnoe povedenie v sovremen- nom mire [Seven ways to a catastrophe. Destructive behaviour in the modern world]. Novosibirsk, Nauka,
Sibirskoe otdelenie, 224 p.
Kuda idet rossiiskaia kul’tura? [Which way is the Russian science going?] (2016). In Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy], 9, 3-60.
Levi-Strauss, K. (1985). Strukturnaia antropologiia [Structural Anthropology]. Мoscow, Glavnaia
redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury, 536 p.
Lotman, Yu.M. (2002). Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury i iskusstva [Articles on semiotics of culture and art]. Мoscow, Akademicheskii proekt, 544 p.
Markov, B.V. (2009). Filosofskaia kontseptualizatsiia cheloveka [Philosophic concetualisation of man].
In Analitika kul’turologii [Analytics of culture studies], 15, 17-26.
– 1273 –
Igor A. Belyaev and Maksim N. Lyashchenko. Socio-Cultural Determinacy of Human Loneliness
Marx, K. (1956). Iz rannikh proizvedenii [Early works]. Мoscow, Gospolitizdat, 632 p.
Marx, K. (1955). Sochineniia: v 50 t [Collected works: in 50 volumes]. Мoscow, Gospolitizdat, 3, 630 p.
Marx, K. (1961). Sochineniia: v 50 t [Collected works: in 50 volumes]. Мoscow, Gospolitizdat, 23, 908 p.
Marx, K. (1962). Sochineniia: v 50 t[Collected works: in 50 volumes].Мoscow, Gospolitizdat, 27, 536 p.
Miiuskevich, B. (1989). Odinochestvo: mezhdisplinarnyi podkhod [Loneliness: interdisciplinary ap-
proach]. In Labirinty odinochestva [Labirinths of loneliness]. Мoscow, Progress, 52-87.
Nazaretian, A.P. (2012). Antropologiia nasiliia i kul’tura samoorganizatsii: Ocherki po evoliutsion- no-istoricheskoi evoliutsii [Anthropology of violence and culture of self-organisation. Notes on historical evolution]. Мoscow, LIBRIKOM publishing house, 256 p.
Pivovarov, D.V. (1996). Religioznoe samoopredelenie cheloveka v kontekste kul’tury [Religious
self-determination of a person within the framework of culture]. In Filosofiia samoopredeleniia [Philosophy of self-determination]. Orenburg, 41-70.
Pokrovskii, N.E., Ivanchenko, G.V. (2008) Universum odinochestva: sotsiologicheskie i psikholog- icheskie ocherki [Universum of loneliness: sociological and psychological notes]. Мoscow, Logos, 424 p.
Sorokin, P.A. (1992). Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiia. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilisation. Society]. Мoscow,
Politizdat, 543 p.
Tönnies, F. (2002). Obshchnost’ i obshchestvo. Osnovnye poniatiia chistoi sotsiologii [Community and Society. Main concepts of pure sociology]. Saint-Peterburg, Vladimir Dal’, 452 p.
Tikhonov, G.M. (2005). Odinochestvo: stereotipy real’nost’ [Loneliness: stereotypes and reality].
Izhevsk, IzhGTU publishing house, 374 p.
Tikhonov, G.M. (2013). Fenomen odinochestva: ekzistentsial’nyi aspect [Phenomenon of loneliness:
existential aspect]. In Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i iuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiia iskusst- vovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, philosophic, political and judicial sciences, culture studies and art history. Issues of theory and practice], 1, I, 183-186.
Igor A. Belyaev and Maksim N. Lyashchenko. Socio-Cultural Determinacy of Human Loneliness