Table 2. The effect of microelements on the formation of the plant height of cotton. According to the information given in the table, on May 15, the height of the plant in our control variant was 7.3 cm.
The remaining options were as follows. 7.8 cm in option 1, 7.4 cm in option 2, 7.5 cm in option 3, 7.6 cm in option 4, 7.9 cm in
option 5, 7.7 cm in option 6, 7- in option 7.3 cm, in option 8 8.1 cm, in option 9 7.5 cm, in option 10 7.8 cm, in option 11 7.6 cm,
in option 12 8.2 cm, in option 13 7 .9 cm, in the 14th option it was 7.7 cm.
Options plant height
plant height
plant height
plant height
plant height
plant height
15.05
30.05
15.06
30.06
15.07
30.07
Contraol option 7,3 19,9 26,9 48,7 63,8 80,7 N 200 P 140 K 100 +B 0.02% 7,8 20,6 28,4 51,4 68,7 86,1 N 200 P 140 K 100 +B 0.05% 7,4 20,2 27,1 49,3 65,6 81,2 N 200 P 140 K 100 +Zn 0.02% 7,5 20,4 28,2 50,5 68,6 84,7 N 200 P 140 K 100 +Zn 0.05% 7,6 20,3 27,2 49,1 66,4 82,2 N 200 P 140 K 100 +KUPRUMXIT +NANOSEREBRO 7,9 21,5 28,6 54,3 72,3 87,4 N 200 P 140 K 100 +PMK XZ-Co 2+ 7,7 21,6 28,4 49,6 69,9 85,1 N 200 P 140 K 100 +KUPRUMXIT 7,3 19,9 27,7 48,7 64,7 80,6 N 250 P 175 K 125 +B 0.02% 8,1 20,9 28,5 51,6 69,7 87,7 N 250 P 175 K 125 +B 0.05% 7,5 20,2 27,4 49,4 66,8 82,4 N 250 P 175 K 125 +Zn 0.02% 7,8 20,9 28,8 50,4 69,6 88,4 N 250 P 175 K 125 +Zn 0.05% 7,6 20,4 27,1 49,2 68,5 84,6 N 250 P 175 K 125 +KUPRUMXIT +NANOSEREBRO 8,2 21,5 28,9 50,8 73,4 94,1 N200P175K125+PMK XZ-Co2+ 7,9 20,8 27,6 49,9 70,8 89,2 N250P175K125+KUPRUMXIT 7.7 20.6 27.5 49,4 71.1 91.9
On May 30, our plants grew 19.9 cm in the control option, 20.6 cm in option 1, 20.2 cm in option 2, 20.4 cm in option 3,
20.3 cm in option 4, 21 in option 5, 5 cm, 21.6 cm in option 6, 19.9 cm in option 7, 20.9 cm in option 8, 20.2 cm in option 9 , 20.9
cm in option 10, 20.4 cm in option 11, It was 21.5 cm in the 12th variant, 20.8 cm in the 13th variant, 20.6 cm in the 14th variant.
On June 15, our plants grew 26.9 cm in the control option, 28.4 cm in option 1, 27.1 cm in option 2, 28.2 cm in option 3,
27.2 cm in option 4, 28 in option 5. .6 cm, 28.4 cm in option 6, 27.7 cm in option 7, 28.5 cm in option 8, 27.4 cm in option 9,
28.8 cm in option 10, 27.1 in option 11 cm, 28.9 cm in the 12th variant, 27.6 cm in the 13th variant, 27.5 cm in the 14th var iant.
On June 30, our plants were 48.7 cm in the control option, 51.4 cm in option 1, 49.3 cm in option 2, 50.5 cm in option 3,
49.1 cm in option 4, 54 in option 5. ,3 cm, 49.6 cm in option 6, 48.7 cm in option 7, 51.6 cm in option 8, 49.4 cm in option 9,
50.4 cm in option 10, 49.2 in option 11 cm, 50.8 cm in the 12th variant, 49.9 cm in the 13th variant, 49.4 cm in the 14th variant.
On July 15, our plants grew 63.8 cm in the control option, 68.7 cm in option 1, 65.6 cm in option 2, 68.6 cm in option 3,
66.4 cm in option 4, 72 in option 5. .3 cm, 69.9 cm in option 6, 64.7 cm in option 7, 69.7 cm in option 8, 66.8 cm in option 9,
69.6 cm in option 10, 68.5 in option 11 cm, 73.4 cm in the 12th variant, 70.8 cm in the 13th variant, 71.1 cm in the 14th var iant.
On July 30, 80.7 cm in the control option, 86.1 cm in option 1, 81.2 cm in option 2, 84.7 cm in option 3, 82.2 cm in option
4, 87
in option 5 ,4 cm, 85.1 cm in option 6, 80.6 cm in option 7, 87.7 cm in option 8, 82.4 cm in option 9, 88.4 cm in option 10, 84.6
in option 11 cm, 94.1 cm in the 12th version, 89.2 cm in the 13th version, 91.9 cm in the 14th version.
The results of plant productivity are given in Table 3.