988
According to a prominent researcher in the field of management, P. Drucker, “effectiveness results from
doing the right things”. Essentially, effectiveness applies primarily to attaining the goals of the organization,
it reflects the quality of the drilling works, and major importance is attributed to proper goal-setting.
A. Feigenbaum believes that the formation of the category of effectiveness is associated with the logic of
the conceptual sequence: need – goal – end result. In this case, the goal as an element of management reality
is determined by the needs of stakeholders. The end result takes the form of satisfaction of a certain need
on which the system is focused.
F. M. Rusinov associates effectiveness with the implementation of management objectives and the
performance of the managed object for a certain period. Thus, the goal to
implementation of which is
assessed can be compared with the end result – the product and the degree to which it satisfies the social
needs of society. End results as an economic category have to be expressed in a system of indicators that
reflect their quantity and quality.
N.V. Tereshchenko and N.S Iashin (2016) argue that effectiveness characterizes the level of goal
achievement, as a condition for the organization to achieve the necessary results.
Based on the proposed provisions, we can formulate the following definition: effectiveness is assessed as
the degree of attainment of the results of drilling operations adequate to the established and intended goals
(gas inflow stimulation) that meet the needs of stakeholders (customers and the drilling enterprise) and
creates conditions for the constant development of the drilling organization.
Proceeding from the above provisions as initial data, we can conclude that the performance of operations
can be effective if the following conditions are satisfied:
- the goals are viewed as temporary, derived from the requirements imposed by both the drilling customer
and the drilling organization;
- the content of the goals corresponds to the characteristics of the drilling organization and reflects the
internal and external conditions of its functioning;
- the set goals are successfully achieved and justify the resources spent; the required cost-benefit ratio is
met;
- the goals are attained by the accepted and universally approved means of the enterprise; the need for this
condition is determined by the socio-economic environment of the drilling organization, and its satisfaction
prevents additional costs brought by social conflicts that may arise at the enterprise (Koontz, O’Donnell,
2014; Merkushova, 2011; Sazhin, Pletneva, 2014).
There are three blocks of factors that affect the effectiveness of work performance. The first block consists
of systemwide factors that determine the prerequisites for the efficient operation of the drilling enterprise:
- the degree of implementation of the principles of work of drilling organizations;
- organizational culture formed and developing at the drilling enterprise;
- the system of selection and evaluation of managerial decisions made by the organization’s executives with
respect to the execution of drilling operations and the choice of the gas inflow stimulation method;
989
- the organizational mechanism that provides coordination and interconnection
of technical and
technological processes as part of gas inflow stimulation.
The second block covers external factors that limit the activities of the drilling organization and are caused
by communication patterns, the key among which are the requirements of the external environment (the
state and the region) and the constraints of investment resources;
The third block includes the factors of development management of the drilling organization, the presence
of prospective programs of drilling operations, and provision with resources.
In terms of the significance and impact of particular factors, it is necessary to distinguish those that exert
the strongest influence on the effectiveness of gas inflow stimulation drilling (Skripko, 2013; Stepanov,
2012).
For an organization providing drilling services to be successful for a long period of time and successfully
achieve its goals, the organization needs to be both efficient and effective (Shvets, 2014).
According to P. Drucker, effectiveness is the result of “doing the right things”, while efficiency comes from
“these things being done right”.
Efficiency in general should be presented through relation and comparison. Efficiency
is the relation of
some effect (result) to the costs of its attainment. For example, the value of an indicator has to be compared
to either some ideal value or to the level achieved by organizations previously (Vaganov et al., 2017). Here
it is crucial to distinguish between cost-effectiveness and efficiency. The fact that the amount of resources
spent was less or more than planned does not indicate effectiveness.
The present study investigated the terminological foundations for the assessment of the effectiveness of gas
inflow stimulation drilling operations and considered the main approaches to effectiveness assessment.
Analysis of the approach showed that the most acceptable and appropriate for today's practice and for
successful work are the system and process approaches, which allow organizing the work as a continuous
chain of structural and logical stages affecting the processes of substantiating the feasibility of inflow
stimulation by implementing sequential, logically interrelated stages.
The paper provides a classification and analysis of the most prominent Russian and foreign methods and
identifies the problems that arise in assessing the effectiveness of gas inflow stimulation operations at the
final stage of field development. The existing definitions of effectiveness give reason to conclude that the
effectiveness assessment method allows for a broader consideration of the entire variety of factors, goals,
and economic results, which demonstrates the particular importance of effectiveness assessment.
The conducted analysis of the current state of scientific and methodological support for the functioning of
an organization reveals the lack of an accessible scientifically grounded
method for assessing the
effectiveness of performed works that would be adapted to the real conditions of scientific organizations
and rely on the fundamental principles of classic management on the one hand and modern information
technology on the other.
We propose a comprehensive approach to the assessment of gas inflow stimulation operations that delivers
interrelated effectiveness assessments. The described effectiveness assessment method assumes the
following sequence of key stages: classification
and ranking of processes; formation of the set of
performance indicators and their ranking by significance; comparison of the current value of indicators with
their normative values; point
scoring of each indicator; calculation of the effectiveness of processes and
group of processes; and calculation of the integral indicator of the organization’s effectiveness.