11
MA’RUZALARNING QISQACHA MAZMUNI BİLDİRİ ÖZETLERİ KİTABI
sequentially in a specific time and place, starting from Mesopotamia, Egypt, Ancient
Greece, Rome, and Europe. Occasionally, China and India are included in this
sequence. However, Turkestan is not included, and when Turkestan is mentioned,
it is attributed to the role of facilitating the transfer of communication tools from
China to the Muslim world and then to Europe. This is due to the portrayal of the
Turkestan people as nomadic, illiterate, and lacking media in Western and Chinese
historiography. This perspective is also reiterated in communication history taught
in Turkey.
However, the reality is very different. Many communication tools that are now
considered significant milestones in communication history emerged in Turkestan
either concurrently or long before they appeared in other civilizations: writing,
painting, paper, printing press, and more. In this sense, the history of communication
and media in Turkestan has an ancient past comparable to the mentioned regions in
the dominant narrative.
In this paper, communication and media history will be approached from
a Turkestan-centric perspective, shedding light on the impact and significance
of archaeological and ethnographic evidence discovered in the region on world
communication history. Furthermore, efforts will be made to highlight the rightful
place that Turkestan-centric inventions and tools should have in the history of
communication and media. In this context, the approach of communication history
theorist Harold Innis, which emphasizes that each civilization has a specific cultural
orientation tied to time and space, as well as his theories that the emergence of
communication tools is more closely related to demand than supply, will be used.
Dostları ilə paylaş: