If you think about it, there are quite a
lot of sources of this belief — early cultures,
different religions, early Christians, some
modern Christians, and many New Age
groups. While the idea of awareness
before
birth may not be everyone‘s cup of tea, for
those who accept it, it provides an extended
perspective through which to view
abortion.
Implications for abortion?
hether you go along with the
first premise of awareness
before birth or whether you
also accept awareness before conception,
here are the corresponding implications for
abortion. If we are self-aware before birth
then:
A fetus has awareness, whether that
comes from the brain or soul.
A fetus is likely aware during an
abortion, if not at a physical level, then
at a soul level.
Babies are more intelligent than we
think.
If we are self-aware before this
existence:
We are more than a physical body; we
are spiritual beings also.
We are likely here for a reason.
We are subject to spiritual laws as well
as earthly laws.
Abortion does not just remove a growing
human being but also a soul from a
body.
We may have been aware of the tests
that would face us in this life.
The soul of your baby is aware of the
circumstances he or she will be born
into.
Reason #88
―If we are aware before birth or
possibly conception, then we
might
have
a
different
perspective on abortion‖
W
387
Reason #89
There could be a soul
just waiting to come
into your life
A Gift Especially for You
This little soul really wants to be here, so
it‘s meant to be.
1246
—Susan Sarandon, mom
id you ever consider that specific
souls might have been assigned to
be born through you and only you?
That they need your life experience, your
talents or your personality to grow as they
need to? Here are a couple of real life
stories on the topic of getting the child you
are meant to have.
Ned had already had an abortion with a
previous girlfriend when he got involved in
a serious brawl that led him close to death.
While the ambulance crew tried to
resuscitate him, Ned left his body. He
floated above the scene and into the
presence of God. There, Ned was shown
things about his life and future. When he
saw some toddlers playing together he
understood that one among them was the
child he aborted. Later in his experience he
was given a second chance and shown a
particular boy who could be his future son
when he returned to life. Ned believes that
today his son is that same one.
1247
In this
case Ned got another chance to bring in a
soul God sent to him.
Fay was already a mother of four
when she just knew she was pregnant.
Contraception had failed. Feeling rebellious
and unable to cope, Fay booked an
appointment at Planned Parenthood, and
might have gone ahead, when a friend
called her out of the blue, begging her to
wait and not go ahead with whatever she
was doing. Well, Fay met with her friend
and let out all her pent-up feelings…but
she still wanted an abortion. Her friend
again begged her to wait just a little longer.
That night as she lay in bed, Fay became
aware of a girl‘s laughter and voice speaking
to her, ―Why are you so sad? I‘m Caitlin
and I‘m your baby. Please don‘t do this!
Everything is going to be okay. All you
have to do is ask for what you need and
help will be there for you. Please don‘t do
this. I want to be there in your life and I
need to come now!‖ Over the next few days
Fay started to connect with her baby and
feel her presence. She changed her mind
and gave to birth to a child.
1248
Fay opened
herself to God‘s timing and received the
little girl child she was meant to have.
This story of a young Japanese schoolgirl
was published in a local Japanese paper.
D
388
This young girl was going through a
difficult time. Her parents had divorced and
her mother had committed suicide. It was
revealed that her brothers were not her
biological brothers, and the man she just
married had suddenly died in a car
accident! And there in the midst of all this
distress she found herself pregnant. One
day, while sitting on a park bench
contemplating suicide, a boy of 5 appeared
to her. She recognized him as her future
son. This vision conveyed to her that he
loved her and wanted to live. Realizing that
she could not take her son‘s life as well as
hers, she turned to her in-laws‘ home, who
welcomed her as their daughter and helped
her raise her child. Five years later she was
not surprised to find that her son looked
just like the vision that saved her life. In
the midst of her pain, this woman was
given a gift that saved her life.
1249
Children are a gift from
God
few more thoughts…
He will love you and bless you and increase
your numbers. He will bless the fruit of
your womb…You will be blessed more
than any other people; none of your men or
women will be childless.
—Deuteronomy 7:13-14
Then the L
ORD
your God will make you
most prosperous in all the work of your
hands and in the fruit of your womb, the
young of your livestock and the crops of
your land. The L
ORD
will again delight in
you and make you prosperous.
—
Deuteronomy 30:9-10
Sons are a heritage from the L
ORD
,
children a reward from him.
—Psalm 127:3
Reason #89
―Children are a gift from God —
will you accept your special
gift?‖
A
389
Reason #90
Abortion is not just a
Catholic issue
Why do we think abortion is
only a Catholic concern?
lot of people seem to think that if
you‘re anti-abortion you must be
Catholic. Now, it‘s true that most
Catholics identify as pro-life, but that
doesn‘t make abortion a Catholic issue any
more than third-world poverty is because
their church is passionate about fighting it.
Indeed just because one group takes up a
cause — be it environmental degradation or
education — doesn‘t mean that they now
own the issue. However, since Catholics
tend to be more outspoken on the issue, the
issue has come to be looked at as an issue
between the Catholics and the non-
Catholics.
The other reason we see abortion as a
Catholic issue is that the early pro-choice
movement wanted us to see it that way.
Former founding member of NARAL, Dr.
Bernard
Nathanson,
explains,
―Our
movement persistently tarred all opposition
with the brush of the Roman Catholic
Church or its hierarchy‖
1250
What was the
reasoning behind this? They believed the
public would better support them in
legalizing abortion if they could portray the
opposition as someone, instead of some
vague law on paper. Specifically, they chose
to criticize the Catholic hierarchy — a
group big enough to not require specific
names but small enough that not all
Catholics would feel alienated.
1251
So, there are two reasons on how
abortion got to be seen as a Catholic issue;
though, as we‘ll see next, you don‘t have to
be religious to be pro-life.
You don‘t have to be
religious to be pro-life
Even if God does not exist, the fetus
does.
1252
—former abortionist, Bernard Nathanson
ou don‘t have to be religious to be
pro-life. No, in fact, the early
opponents of abortion in this
country were doctors not priests. Pro-
choice author, James Mohr, confirms it,
saying, ―The vigorous efforts of America‘s
regular physicians would prove in the long
run to be the single most important
factor‖
1253
in opposing abortion. Perhaps
they better than anyone saw and
understood what an abortion destroyed, at
a time when religious leaders kept silent on
matters of sex and reproduction. The pro-
choice author also admits, ―The origins and
A
Y
390
evolution of anti-abortion attitudes in the
United States owed relatively little to the
influence or the activities of organized
religion.‖
1254
So, if abortion is not a religious issue per
se, could you be atheist and pro-life? Of
course! According to my own logic (that‘s
non-religious, I believe) and an authentic
atheist forum online, it‘s possible to be pro-
life and atheist. In fact, it‘s not only
possible, but there are people out there who
hold that perspective.
1255
For whatever
reason, they have given up God (or perhaps
never found Him) but still hold to their
pro-life non-religious opinions. What
would be an example of a pro-life non-
religious opinion? Anything that does not
refer to God. For example, any argument
involving logic, human rights, human
suffering, social justice or science could be
used by an atheist. Here is one atheist
opinion that refutes abortion for scientific
reasons:
―I decided when I was thirteen that I
was both an atheist and pro-life. I became
an atheist because I had no belief in a
spiritual reality. I became prolife because
my biology class taught a section about the
development of the human embryo and
fetus.‖
1256
A circulating letter by an avowedly anti-
religious pro-lifer refutes abortion on many
grounds including:
that it goes against his belief in liberty
and justice
that the fetus is not a woman‘s body and
therefore does not come under her right
to liberty
that a fetus being innocent and without
crime deserves to be treated justly
that abortion is cruel and animals
receive better treatment
1257
So, we just looked at how the early
opponents of abortion were medical
professionals, not clergy, and we also saw
that it‘s possible to take a pro-life position
from a purely non-religious viewpoint.
Indeed, it‘s possible precisely because
abortion does go beyond doctrine, creed or
dogma. After all, it‘s really about human
rights.
A human rights concern
he right to life is the most basic
human right there is. Without that
right, no other rights are possible.
What are these rights and where do they
come from?
For an atheist it is something we owe to
each other out of human decency. It‘s
something that feels right and it‘s to do
with justice. You don‘t have to believe in
God to support human rights in third-world
nations — or your own. All you need is a
heart and a belief that taking innocent life
T
391
is unethical.
For a believer in a higher power, it‘s
something that‘s God-given. I like the
words attributed to America‘s 2
nd
President,
John Adams, when he said, ―You have
rights
antecedent
to
all
earthly
governments; rights that cannot be repealed
or restrained by human laws; rights derived
from
the
Great
Legislator
of
the
Universe.‖
1258
If it‘s God-given then it is not
something your government bestows on
you for being a good taxpayer. Instead, a
right is something you already own and
laws can only affirm that right not hand it
out.
The right to life is recognized
worldwide and in all human rights treaties
as a basic right. Why don‘t we recognize
the unborn children as well? The issue of
abortion is not Catholic or religious but is
about the basic human right of the fetus,
the unborn child.
Reason #90
―The abortion issue goes beyond
belief systems‖
Reason #91
The Judeo-Christian
heritage is pro-life
Early societies and abortion
ome pro-choicers like to show how
abortion has been around forever,
thereby somehow legitimizing it.
Well, let‘s be honest. It has been around
for a long time, probably as long as many
other activities which are not so wonderful
either. But just because we can trace the
origin of an act back in history does not
prove it‘s a good thing.
While there exists a history of abortion
we also find a history of opposition to it.
Some of those include the Roman
poet Ovid (43
BC
-
AD
17) who condemned
abortion,
questioning
the
lack
of
motherliness, ―Where is the maternal
sense?‖
1259
Juvenal, another Roman poet,
(1
st
-2
nd
century
AD
) wrote that abortions
killed a child,
―
So great is the skill, so
powerful the drugs, of the abortionist, paid
to murder mankind within the womb‖ —
but jested that it was good for the rich men
so their wives might give birth to Ethiopian
children.
1260
Finally, the famous Hippocratic Oath,
which originated in 4
th
century Greece, has
S
392
doctors entering the medical profession
promising to avoid abortion (see
Reason
#64: Abortion is not real medicine
). The
oath
won
acceptance
among
Jews,
Christians and Arabs, and persisted all these
centuries, only recently being substantially
altered.
1261
Although some Romans and Greeks
practiced abortion, we have to remember
that all of these ancient civilizations that
permitted abortion did not have the ability
that we have today, to see the baby under
ultrasound, to know how life begins and so
on. If it is also true that Rome fell because
of its decadence, should we really take this
as an example?
Early Judaism
udaism
was
around
long
before
Christianity developed. In fact, Jesus
worshipped at Jewish not Christian
synagogues. (Christianity had not yet
become a religion at that point.) Since both
religions share a similar history in the Old
Testament, let‘s look at the pro-life roots in
ancient Judaism.
Author Michael J. Gorman makes the
statement that ―it was a given of Jewish
thought and life that abortion, like
exposure [infanticide], was unacceptable,
and this was well known in the ancient
world.‖
1262
He also notes how historians of
the time linked Jewish opposition to
abortion to their religious beliefs. It was
rare for Jews to engage in deliberate
abortion. A Jewish text from around 50
BC
-
AD
50 says, ―A woman should not destroy
the unborn babe in her belly nor after its
birth throw it before the dogs and vultures
as a prey.‖
1263
Early Christianity
arly Christianity found many groups
and organizations representing the
followers of Christ. One early
Christian writing, the Didache, a code of
living written in the 2
nd
century
AD
, by
leaders within a couple of generations of
the apostles, takes a clear stand on abortion
writing, ―Thou shalt not murder a child by
abortion/destruction.‖
1264
Another source on early Christian
beliefs about abortion comes from an early
church father, Clement of Alexandria.
Clement believed in the soul and pre-
existence, and so it was no surprise when
he considered the soul attached to the body
at the moment of conception. He would
therefore have concluded that abortion was
killing a fetus with a soul.
1265
Clement has
the advanced teaching here. Churches
would later cite ‗quickening‘ (when the
mother feels her baby) as the time the soul
joined the body. Today quickening is
considered an outdated teaching. (See
Reason #13: At what point do you say it‘s
J
E
393
too far along to abort
.
)
Clement believed that women who
abort ―abort at the same time their human
feelings.‖
1266
He also believed that both
parents would be responsible for the sins of
abortion — sounds logical to me. Clement
believed that a caretaking angel would take
the souls of the aborted children to
safety.
1267
Another early Christian, a church father
by the name of Tertullian — although often
an opponent of Clement, did agree on this
matter of abortion being wrong:
―In our case, murder being once for all
forbidden, we may not destroy even the
foetus in the womb, while as yet the human
being derives blood from other parts of the
body for its sustenance. To hinder birth is
merely a speedier man-killing; nor does it
matter whether you take away a life that is
born, or destroy one that is coming to the
birth.‖
1268
Reason #91
―There is a historical tradition of
defending life‖
Reason #92
Move with the
changing attitudes on
abortion
Pro choicers admit abortion
is on the way out
ro-choicers think abortion is not
going to be here forever:
On the 35th anniversary of Roe v.
Wade, our country is on the brink of
abandoning its commitment that abortion
will be safe, legal, and available …abortion
bans being promoted in at least 17 states are
sounding the death knell for the landmark
constitutional decision.
1269
—Rev. Carlton W. Veazey, Religious Coalition for
Reproductive Choice
Today Roe is in more jeopardy than
ever.
1270
—Hillary Clinton, January 24 2005, New York
State Family Planning Providers
We are not winning this battle.
1271
—Alexander Sanger, grandson of Margaret Sanger,
quoted in
Abortion Under Attack: Women on the
Challenges Facing Choice
P
394
We've been losing fight after fight after
fight.
1272
—Pro-choice Senator Dianne Feinstein, MSNBC Dostları ilə paylaş: |